• HiImThomasPynchon [des/pair, it/its]
    ·
    11 months ago

    Umm acktchually vampires don't require human blood to survive as such. It's more of an addiction, where if they go too long without blood, they go into a frenzy and get killed by concerned citizens.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      11 months ago

      There are so many versions of the vampire lore, going back centuries, that what you say only applies to some of them and what I said only applies to some of them. Sometimes even sunlight doesn't harm them and just makes them sparkle because the writer is that obsessed with husbando power fantasies.

      • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        vampires as blood sucking thinking beings more or less is an invention of 18th century English gothic literature. Most of the elements you would recognise as being a vampire were made up wholecloth by Polidori. Like how orcs aren't from folklore and Tolkein made them up

        the folk stories they are based on are more similar to zombie myths or ghouls than what we would recognise as vampires and seem to have been morality plays about the importance of properly burying dead family rather than leaving old corpses in your house. Although the detail that a vampires first victim is always the one they loved the most in the folklore is a pretty good dramatic touch

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you really want to dig that far back, vampires were supposed to be ugly. Bloated, discolored, grotesque like the corpses that were accused of being vampires hiding in their coffins.

          Turning vampires into a Mary Sue power fantasy of beauty was a later contrivance, and a very annoying and tiresome one.