• glingorfel [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    being a bot is when you have pronouns and the more pronouns you have the more Russian you are

    • Farman [any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have "any". So do i have the most pronouns or the least?

      • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        We're a radically pro-trans community. A purge of transphobes near the beginning was a formative moment for our community. We're radically welcoming of trans folks, so a lot of trans folks post here.

        Also trans folks are disproportionately leftist (for a good reason, liberation for trans folks cannot come through capitalism), the idea that "tankies" would be majority "he/him neckbeards" is silly, if not actually outright transphobic.

        • Bernie2028@midwest.social
          ·
          1 year ago

          trans folks are disproportionately leftist for a good reason

          I said "tankies," not leftists. I'm sure most trans people are democratic socialists, anarchists, or non-authoritarian communists. I have a hard time believing a lot of you guys aren't disinformation bots.

          • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            The way "tankie" is used today it just means communist who has actually read communist theory and understands the nature of imperialism and applies it correctly to the current geopolitical situation in the world.

            Solipsism and paranoia win the day in your brain yet again. People can't possibly earnestly have these opinions, because I'm not used to them, must be bots. Doesnt matter that they have three years of post history where they talk about innocuous stuff that has nothing to do with Russia and china. Thats just part of the act. And the fact that you think the pronoun tags make it MORE likely that we're bots is even more laughable.

            Its really fucking depressing seeing how effective the "bot" propaganda has been.

            • Bernie2028@midwest.social
              ·
              1 year ago

              At this point I don't think you're a bot but it's pretty obvious many of you are. The fact any and every comment gets 10+ upvotes in 15 minutes is unnatural for a site like this. There should be some comments with under 5 upvotes but I NEVER see hexbear comments get under that.

              I have a hard time believing any community is that gender diverse.

              • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
                ·
                1 year ago

                The fact any and every comment gets 10+ upvotes in 15 minutes is unnatural for a site like this. There should be some comments with under 5 upvotes but I NEVER see hexbear comments get under that.

                What can I say, we're a united front when it comes to arguing with liberals. Honestly, we didnt really see upvote totals as high as these before federation, which I think is a combination of the fact that we're, like I said, united in the face of these issues, and also the fact that some people in other instances agree with us. We care about each other and communist is a collectivist ideology. There's also a lot of us. And trust me, if you believe I"M not a bot then I can tell you that in the three years before federation noone here stuck me as not being a genuine human being. Other than the bit accounts and like the like, two actual bots we made for specific purposes.

                I have a hard time believing any community is that gender diverse.

                Damn, thats weird because every community I'm a part of is gender diverse. Even not explictly leftist ones, like I'm in a discord server for a streamer called Barry and like half the server is trans or nonbinary. I'm pretty used to interacting with trans and enby people in my life at this point. Have a fair few of them in my life offline as well. This seems like a you problem.

              • Zrc
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                deleted by creator

                  • Zrc
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    deleted by creator

                      • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        Or, maybe, just maybe - and I know it's hard for some one like you to believe - there are just people out there who disagree with you.

                      • Zrc
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        3 months ago

                        deleted by creator

                      • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        What a beautiful brain you have you think anyone has been running a website full of bots for three years in the hope that one day Reddit might implode and they can be used to trick some lost redditors.

              • Zrc
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                deleted by creator

              • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
                ·
                1 year ago

                You're talking about one of the oldest lemmy instances, the most active established instance, and the instance with highest per capita activity, at a time when activity has suddenly become higher than ever because suddenly there are a bunch of redditors saying awful shit all over our feeds and we can go dunk on them without needing to bother with accounts on different sites for the first time in over three years.

                You're also vastly overestimating what bots require and do: all we have to do is look at the largest and most sophisticated botnets - the CIA/State Department astroturfing botnets - to see how even the laziest and crudest copy/pasta spam is all it takes to completely dominate and drown out opposition. Literally no one needs to be sneaky, just yell the exact same verbatim press release quote over and over from ten thousand firstnamelastname12345 accounts with stock photo profile pics and you control the conversation completely and no one cares if you get caught out, like the CIA/State Department bots constantly do.

                You're also claiming that the instance was built up with chatbots more sophisticated than anything there is today - and all of those still-not-coherent most-sophisticated AIs are extremely expensive to run - starting at a time when the most advanced language generating AI was GPT-2, which was only a step or so above old markov chain babbling. You can literally go and look at the ancient post history yourself.

                • Bernie2028@midwest.social
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I would believe you, but it's very possible you're a bot and everything you just said is an AI trained to say this in order to make people reduce their doubts about your user authenticity.

                  • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Or you could go and look at the three years of post history the community has, which notably does not revolve around some herculean effort to gaslight a tiny handful of people from sites that did not exist for 90% of hexbear's existence and that no one had any realistic expectation would ever exist.

                    The entire theory rests on the idea that [insert bad country] had LLMs that were five years ahead of the curve and the supercomputers to run them, and this was devoted to generating massive amounts of content on the speculation that maybe someday it would provide legitimization in a fringe internet community, instead of using that massive technological and material advantage to spam as hard as possible with infinite free burner accounts on mainstream social media sites.

                    • Bernie2028@midwest.social
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      The entire theory rests on the idea that [insert bad country] had LLMs that were five years ahead of the curve and the supercomputers to run them, and this was devoted to generating massive amounts of content on the speculation that maybe someday it would provide legitimization in a fringe internet community, instead of using that massive technological and material advantage to spam as hard as possible with infinite free burner accounts on mainstream social media sites.

                      LOL try to be a little more realistic of a bot, no human talks like.

                  • Zrc
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    deleted by creator

                  • silent_water [she/her]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    your worldview is 1) dehumanizing and 2) utterly non-falsifiable. treat people like people.

          • HornyOnMain
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            More than half of our mods and admins are trans or enby and most of the rest are some other flavour of queer, about a quarter to a third or so of the user base is trans or enby iirc based on the poll we did on the demographics of the user base a year or so ago, I'm trans, the person you're speaking to is an enby I believe, about half of the people dunking on you are trans/enby and almost all are queer because hexbear is radically anti discrimination and routinely cyberbullies bigots

            We're literally the largest explicitly queer instance on Lemmy except blahaj.zone

          • silent_water [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            quite literally no. I'm a trans person and find hexbear to be one of the most radically accepting of any online space I've ever encountered next to purely trans ones. in some cases moreso because we ban truscum.

          • Staines [they/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            You're having a hard time because you're realizing you're closer to being a bot than we are.

      • Zrc
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • jack [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I've met many liberal politicians, activists, and organizers in my life. I've been to many polling places dominated by liberals. This is absolutely not true and a weird thing to say - tons of women and Black people are present. Liberalism is a white supremacy upholding system, but it's also the only option many marginalized people believe they have because of how closed off political horizons are in the US. For careerists, it gives an opportunity to be a black face in a high place.

          Soc Dem spaces, yeah, ime, this is correct.

        • Bernie2028@midwest.social
          ·
          1 year ago

          Liberal and Soc-Dem spaces are mostly white male neckbeards

          No they aren't tf. Maybe on reddit but that's 90% of reddit.

          • build_a_bear_group [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, that is true, even if it is less directly disqualifying of the specific political tendencies, and the closing of practical horizons of American politics meant that there is a vast demobilization of political action. So, mostly because voting and engagement with mainstream politics is highly correlated with several axes of privilege, white people vote more than non-white, wealthy vote more than poor, etc. So, most mainstream politics and all electoral positions over-represents white middle-to-upper class. There is less of a gender gap on the face of it for parties than one would think because there are a lot of white and women from conservative areas that vote Republican. But there is also a boomerang effect of people that are privileged enough to not suffer ill effects of failure of sabotaged progressive movements such as the Black Panthers and Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition are more likely to vote to the left of the Democratic Party. Because you could get some minor pork-barrel spending if you support the establishment over progressive candidate that will just be crushed by the machine or fizzle out due to internal fractures and more minor sabotage.

            So, yes they are. Maybe that is 90% of electoral politics, but it is true that Soc-Dems are disproportionately white men. Though that is more of mainstream politics over-representing privilege on many axes. And also if it is divorced from daily struggle and immediate issues (as mainstream politics works to alienate us from), then politics becomes horse-race stuff for nerds.