• UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    9 months ago

    That smuglord in a recent thread that said "programming.dev doesn't allow politics" certainly allows programming.dev's nonpolitical politics to ooze anywhere I can see a programming.dev user address of origin. smuglord

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
      ·
      9 months ago

      "I don't have time to discuss politics, I'm too busy getting the master and slave drives to work together."

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        9 months ago

        "That's just technology. Technology is nonpolitical." smuglord

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            ·
            9 months ago

            "If you don't like the Torment Nexus, just don't draw the ire of Immortal Cyberlord Bezos. Simple!" lord-bezos-amused

      • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
        ·
        9 months ago

        I never got the complaints about that. It's not inherently bad to have one thing exert complete control over another thing.. the problem is when you start doing it to people

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don't think I've seen anyone with a problem with the computing concept itself, they have a problem with the unnecessarily unpleasant and offensive nomenclature. There's lots of ways to express a leader/follower dynamic that's intuitively understandable. Hell, call them Dom/Sub drives if you want to.

          There's just no good reason to invoke historical attrocity that's still ongoing to describe a concept like this.

          • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
            ·
            9 months ago

            Ok fair point and that is a really funny idea. But afaict dom/sub dynamics aren't complete control and it would be pretty dangerous if they were