I have seen many people in this community either talking about switching to Brave, or people who are actively using Brave. I would like to remind people that Brave browser (and by extension their search engine) is not privacy-centric whatsoever.

Brave was already ousted as spyware in the past and the company has made many decisions that are questionable at best. For example, Brave made a cryptocurrency which they then added to a rewards program that is built into the browser to encourage you to enable ads that are controlled by Brave.

After creating this cryptocurrency and rewards program, they started inserting affiliate codes into URL's. Prior to this they had faked fundraising for popular social media creators.

Do these decisions seem like ones a company that cares about their users (and by extension their privacy) would make? I'd say the answer is a very clear no.

One last thing, Brave illegally promoted an eToro affiliate program making a fortune from its users who will likely lose their money.

  • Maoo [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Money is involved because people want to make a living off of their project. Also, every major browser has been backed with huge amounts of funding because supporting a browser is very difficult.

    That said, that doesn't mean every browser project is good, either. Just that it's reasonable to see why people would want to get income from their work.

    PS the Brave CEO sucks so I'm not sympathizing with him here.

    • Katlah@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      This person was talking about the making money aspect (the rewards program) in the browser, not the browser itself making money off their users. At least that's what I believe they were talking about.

      • Maoo [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I see. Not sure what they mean by "pay once", that was what made me think it was about buying software.

      • Izzy@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indeed. I am curious about why it needs to be there at all even as an opt-in. Some thought process went into implementing it into the browser in the first place. Did this solve any problem someone had? I am actually curious and actually do not understand.