I have seen many people in this community either talking about switching to Brave, or people who are actively using Brave. I would like to remind people that Brave browser (and by extension their search engine) is not privacy-centric whatsoever.

Brave was already ousted as spyware in the past and the company has made many decisions that are questionable at best. For example, Brave made a cryptocurrency which they then added to a rewards program that is built into the browser to encourage you to enable ads that are controlled by Brave.

After creating this cryptocurrency and rewards program, they started inserting affiliate codes into URL's. Prior to this they had faked fundraising for popular social media creators.

Do these decisions seem like ones a company that cares about their users (and by extension their privacy) would make? I'd say the answer is a very clear no.

One last thing, Brave illegally promoted an eToro affiliate program making a fortune from its users who will likely lose their money.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    11 months ago

    For a lot of people, way too many people, using Brave is a political statement that is paradoxically supposedly against political statements. It's a spite choice that justifies the cryptogrifting, spyware, and the horrid political views of its owner.

    • Katlah@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      hexagon
      ·
      11 months ago

      I can't really comment on this claim but I posted this under the assumption that most people in this community care about their privacy, not about politics.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        most people in this community care about their privacy, not about politics

        Whether you want to see them or not, privacy concerns can and do have political implications, especially when what is supposed to be a privacy tool is itself violating privacy because of the whims and wishes of the person that owns the proprietary software.