• UlyssesT [he/him]
        hexbear
        11
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        This is precisely why I find myself always taking a step back whenever I end up aligning with the socialist left on social politics.

        Sure, sure, you are as leftist as they come, butt

        Everytime it is about cis het men self improvement or working out

        Or you pretending it's all you're doing when you write Elliot Rodger tier shit like this:

        Show

        no social consideration for men

        I can already see the Petersonian crocodile tears. up-yours-woke-moralists

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            hexbear
            8
            9 months ago

            Sorry

            You're not, but you sound more passive-aggressive with that Reddit-tier opener. If you're that big into "self improvement" try improving your delivery style.

            I never followed lobster boy

            Considering how much you've already either lied about or laughably misread women around you, I'm going to doubt you here. If you truly haven't, and you want to continue your crusade of self pity and totally-not-misogyny misogyny, you're missing out by not signing on with Dr. Professor Peterson Esquire PhD MD. You have no apparent functional differences between your ideology and his.

            About 99% of my politics is pretty much as leftist

            There it is again. You are so totally as leftist as they come, butt

            Show

            The thing with bigots like you is that you think it's some equal (or worse) negative thing to feel even a hint of what you in your privileged position dish out on a regular basis, unnoticed and unseen. If you truly feel oppressed by those evil feeeeemales, look at how many poor oppressed "canceled" men dominate corporate boardrooms and the Fortune 500 list (while burning the planet down).

            is going to get labelled as a "Petersonian" or "pseudointellectual" redpill apologist

            Because you are and have provided absolutely nothing of substance to prove otherwise. If you sermonize against women like a Petersonian, do pseudointellectual Redpill apologism like a pseudointellectual Redpill apologist, and then whine about the labels, the problem is not the labels. It is you.

            Blame the men that need to be blamed.

            You're one of them. I am a man with good relationships with women, from my wife to my coworkers to my friends. The problem is you. Your pretenses of "self improvement" are keeping you in a bitter and hateful rut and I sincerely hope you drop the nonsense someday.

                • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
                  hexbear
                  6
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  As someone that's done self improvement stuff (exercising, running calisthenics, healthier diet, letting stuff from the past go, mental introspection, etc) without the red pill chud nonsense, this guy's comment is just not it. He still hasn't let some girls "cock blocking" him go. What kind of self improvement is that? Clear issues with women here.

                  • UlyssesT [he/him]
                    hexbear
                    5
                    9 months ago

                    That chud is "self improving" the way his not-idol Jordan Peterson "studied communism for 25 years" before the Zizek debate.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              hexbear
              9
              9 months ago

              "Men on the other hand are calm, which is why they calmly write whiny crybully misogynist shit like all of the above."

              • Judge_Jury [comrade/them, he/him]
                hexbear
                10
                9 months ago

                So, what did you telling this feminist about your self improvement look like? Did it involve saying anything about the supposed nature of men and/or women?

                Because you're doing that here, and "self-improvement" has become synonymous with evo-psych quackery like Jordan Peterson's

                  • Judge_Jury [comrade/them, he/him]
                    hexbear
                    8
                    9 months ago

                    I was trying to become socially a good person for friends, to become socially favourable towards girls

                    Those are one and the same thing. Women aren't some other kind of beast that you have to learn about, they're just people that you need to unlearn some distinctions about if you ever want to connect with them. Same goes for men.

                    When I hear another man talk about men being chimps when chasing women, I hear excuses for stereotypical and often violent behavior

                  • UlyssesT [he/him]
                    hexbear
                    7
                    9 months ago

                    I was trying to become socially a good person for friends

                    And you failed.

                    to become socially favourable towards girls

                    And you failed.

                    since I was a whacko with borderline (not fully) redpill beliefs

                    Those never went away.

                    aka not giving a F about her

                    Your self-congratulatory apathy toward other people is self-defeating and the reason you continue to fail. congratulations

                    Does that sound like lobster boy's 12 rules and other evangelist Christian preaching to you?

                    There is no functional difference. If you came up with that shit all by yourself you're just working extra hard when that garbage is already there for the taking.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            hexbear
            7
            9 months ago

            men also get to speak on behalf of all women

            I am a man. I will speak on behalf of men that are not you and tell you to fuck off.