General@lemmygrad.ml to Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml • edit-21 year agoWould Youtubers be considered petit bourgeoisie since they own the means of production (a camera and an editing software) yet they still needs to sell the product of his labor to YouTube ads?message-squaremessage-square29 fedilinkarrow-up128
arrow-up128message-squareWould Youtubers be considered petit bourgeoisie since they own the means of production (a camera and an editing software) yet they still needs to sell the product of his labor to YouTube ads?General@lemmygrad.ml to Ask Lemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml • edit-21 year agomessage-square29 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareFlyberius [comrade/them]hexbear28·edit-21 year agoI would argue that it is the video streaming service that is the real means of production, rather than the camera and software. link
minus-squarePolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.mlhexbear8·1 year agoDisagree. Streaming serivce is a place of exchange, not production. In the same manner you could consider lets's say a city market mean of production - all those also had set of rules and take fees for allowing producers to sell their products. linkfedilink
I would argue that it is the video streaming service that is the real means of production, rather than the camera and software.
Disagree. Streaming serivce is a place of exchange, not production. In the same manner you could consider lets's say a city market mean of production - all those also had set of rules and take fees for allowing producers to sell their products.
Good point.