• usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    it's not fully on your terms because if you refuse to provide sexual content for the only fans subscribers you stop getting paid which means that with the coercion of the market you stop having full and uncoerced control over your ability to refuse to give sexual consent to sharing provocative images of yourself

    • Solarius@lemmy.sdf.org
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the same vein are you not selling your right to consent of your bodily autonomy by being a laborer?

      • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes but your right to refuse to consent type out emails, or stack boxes is less intimate and personal than your control over your sexual consent

        it is for example perfectly socially acceptable to pressurize and even insist that people do various chores which would be deeply immoral in the case of sexual consent. For example your roommate could insist that as a condition of your living arrangement you have to clean the house (which is a bodily autonomy sacrifice as you have to use your body to work potentially against what you want) but they would be out of bounds if they insisted you do sexual favours for them

        • Jordan_U@lemmy.ml
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Onlyfans models generally have the option to apply for a job at McDonald's instead.*

          People working for the military generally do not.

          * Ok, there's actually more nuance here because a large percentage of sex workers are disabled, and lack of accessibility and general ableism prevents them from working most other jobs. But while that's important to understand, it's a different discussion.