iridaniotter [she/her, they/them] to the_dunk_tank • edit-28 months ago[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWimagemessage-square215 arrow-up182file-text
arrow-up182image[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWiridaniotter [she/her, they/them] to the_dunk_tank • edit-28 months agomessage-square215 Commentsfile-text
https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857 No, the art does not depict bestiality, don't worry.
minus-squareAwoo [she/her]hexbear24•8 months agoGrooming animals for sex is the same as grooming children for sex. The people that want to permit one are also the people that debate age of consent laws. link
![[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/f26b2dce-7254-4537-acd1-5de623b591e0.png){kind=link}
Grooming animals for sex is the same as grooming children for sex.
The people that want to permit one are also the people that debate age of consent laws.