iridaniotter [she/her] to the_dunk_tank • 2 years ago[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWimagemessage-square177 linkfedilinkarrow-up182file-text
arrow-up182image[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWiridaniotter [she/her] to the_dunk_tank • 2 years agomessage-square177 Commentslinkfedilinkfile-text
https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857 No, the art does not depict bestiality, don't worry.
minus-squareashinadash [she/her]hexbear9·2 years agoPerhaps the assumption was that you shouldn't need a law against intercourse with animal corpses? Because holy fuck link
minus-squareJohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]Bannedhexbear6·2 years agoyeah you have to think of something to ban it. link
![[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/f26b2dce-7254-4537-acd1-5de623b591e0.png){kind=link}
Perhaps the assumption was that you shouldn't need a law against intercourse with animal corpses? Because holy fuck
yeah you have to think of something to ban it.