iridaniotter [she/her, they/them] to the_dunk_tank • edit-28 months ago[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWimagemessage-square215 arrow-up182file-text
arrow-up182image[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWiridaniotter [she/her, they/them] to the_dunk_tank • edit-28 months agomessage-square215 Commentsfile-text
https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857 No, the art does not depict bestiality, don't worry.
minus-squareDoubledee [comrade/them]hexbear6•8 months agoOkay, that ship has sailed in other words. I think he would just object, he's kinda a Graeber guy, but that makes sense to me. Thanks! link
minus-squareDoubledee [comrade/them]hexbear4•8 months agoDunno, I told people I was curious and wasn't here to argue, I could argue anyway but I'm trying to engage in a way that encourages folks to respond. link
![[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/f26b2dce-7254-4537-acd1-5de623b591e0.png){kind=link}
Okay, that ship has sailed in other words. I think he would just object, he's kinda a Graeber guy, but that makes sense to me. Thanks!
deleted by creator
Dunno, I told people I was curious and wasn't here to argue, I could argue anyway but I'm trying to engage in a way that encourages folks to respond.
deleted by creator