From what I've seen, in context, a whataboutism is concerned about the argument of moral authority and precedent from the person accusing a AES or progressive of something bad...
Here's some rules:
Apply it when it relates to the precedent of incidents that seem exceptionally bad, when committed by Actually-Existing-Socialist countries, but are ignored, if not justified in Capitalist ones... they could be explained as historical thinking of the time or justified under circumstances
For example: https://hexbear.net/post/2329752 (Homosexuality laws compared between historical Soviet Union and the West, lemmygrad meme)
Show
However, don't use irrelevant ones to detract from past mistakes, they make you look daft and aloof
I'll explain more later on...
Its more the outsiders not the libs, if I'm being honest...
Besides, if I wanted to argue with more bad faith libs (outside of Lemmy), it would be in Reddit but I don't...
Sorry pal if I included ye here...