I've read through the communist theory. I usually identify to others as a communist, but it's not truly true. I believe necessities such as housing, water and food should be public owned and managed (through the government). Is there any term for such politics?

I will still back communist organizations and vote for socialist parties, because to my knowledge the alternatives don't align with what I believe in, and I think socialist groups would achieve this. It's not that I'm for private ownership of non-necessities, I just don't feel about it any way, whereas I am extremely against private ownership of housing, healthcare and so on, while believing those should be managed by government.

I am not anti-communism, I just don't feel strongly about that part. I am neurodivergent if that helps make sense. I will appreciate respectful information as I don't believe there's no other people who feel like me and I want to read on that.

      • FuckyWucky [none/use name]
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tbf state lead development under dirigism is the only reason why India has atleast some production capacity.

        • loathesome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          2 months ago

          True. If the book India is Broken by Ashoka Mody is to be believed, it was rather because of focus on the wrong industries (he says Congress focused on heavy industries instead of an export oriented approach) and the lack of investment in basic necessities--specifically primary education and healthcare--which made India's labour force less attractive to foreign investors.