Here's a good & readable summary paper to pin your critiques on

  • itappearsthat
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I would not necessarily say that is true, and the article summarizes a philosophically interesting reason why:

    The basic architecture of these models reveals this: they are designed to come up with a likely continuation of a string of text. It’s reasonable to assume that one way of being a likely continuation of a text is by being true; if humans are roughly more accurate than chance, true sentences will be more likely than false ones.