I absolutely think that's reason enough, but I also have the luxury of preferential voting so I've never had to consider voting for a 'lesser of two evils' even if the degree is quite small.
It would be nice if we had the same, but we'd have to somehow break the duopoly to get it passed in the first place. I'm not sure how that would be feasible without a massive tilt toward a viable third party in the existing system, which seems like a remote possibility.
I don't disagree at all, it just makes my voting choices more straightforward. What I find most sad about it, though, is that even though we could vote for any third party we want, the vast majority still vote for one of the big two basically identical on policy parties.
Isn't this reason enough? If we don't draw the line at genocide, where do we draw the line?
I absolutely think that's reason enough, but I also have the luxury of preferential voting so I've never had to consider voting for a 'lesser of two evils' even if the degree is quite small.
It would be nice if we had the same, but we'd have to somehow break the duopoly to get it passed in the first place. I'm not sure how that would be feasible without a massive tilt toward a viable third party in the existing system, which seems like a remote possibility.
deleted by creator
I don't disagree at all, it just makes my voting choices more straightforward. What I find most sad about it, though, is that even though we could vote for any third party we want, the vast majority still vote for one of the big two basically identical on policy parties.
deleted by creator