• Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]
    ·
    1 个月前

    Yeah right they will take over the river of which the upper stream is already in tibet.

    look at a globe, cracker

    the river does not originate in Tibet, 90% of it originates in the mountains of Arunachal

          • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 个月前

            you literally can't keep track of the argument lmao. done

            the original argument was "losing arunachal = water insecurity"

            you countered with "uhhh the tsangpo is acktshyually in Tibet" and ignored the massive amounts of water (snow) from Arunachal itself

            somehow you can't admit that you're wrong, or you can't keep track of what was said 4 comments ago

            Hint: wanna actually disprove what I said? look at the volume flow rates for all those rivers on your map, and show me that a large amount of it originates from before it hits Arunachal

              • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]
                ·
                1 个月前

                You on the other hand keep insisting that arunachal is the focal point where the river starts and therefore its being grabbed by china.

                Never said this, come up with more interesting headcanon

                No ones genuinely buys that siang just pops out arunachal.

                Again, never said this. the point is that losing control of 90% of your water supply is a lot worse than the current situation of not controlling 10% of it. Numbers!