Unless this person is an expert in 13th Century Mongolian linguistics, I fail to see how they even could feel able to decry pronoun choices as being ahistorical (not that that would even really matter for a vidgam).
The funny part is that they haven't even tried to justify their opinion like that yet. They are just mad in general about the possibility of words being used in a way they refuse to understand.
Unless this person is an expert in 13th Century Mongolian linguistics, I fail to see how they even could feel able to decry pronoun choices as being ahistorical (not that that would even really matter for a vidgam).
The funny part is that they haven't even tried to justify their opinion like that yet. They are just mad in general about the possibility of words being used in a way they refuse to understand.