Original post here: https://hexbear.net/post/3856299?scrollToComments=false

I think we have a general path forward based on community feedback. "We see you, we hear you!"

I went ahead and unpinned the old post. I'm pinning this one for now and will edit this post when I wake up from eepy time. I had a very mid week and have no particular alarm set so be on look out. Love y'all and I'm amped for my first announcement post since coming back. :)

  • replaceable [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    it is functionally the same thing, you can still "dunk" on people, they just have to be public figures, that does not in any way diminish the "fun" in it does it?

    • REgon [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Then it's not functionally the same thing, dipshit.

      that does not in any way diminish the "fun" in it does it?

      Jesus christ you are an insufferable debatebro. Had any normal user done what you did, they'd been banned. Despite you being a condescending smuglord and me therefore treating you like one, it's still probably only me who's gonna catch flak once the rest of your clique wakes up and you can cry to them about it. Eat shit.

    • Esoteir [he/him]
      ·
      4 days ago

      so you can't dunk on the same people as before, they have to be public figures now?

      • replaceable [he/him]
        ·
        4 days ago

        yes, according to you guys the purpose of dunking is for it to be fun and cathartic, it still is if the dunking is on public figures , therefore it is functionally the same

        • Esoteir [he/him]
          ·
          4 days ago

          so for someone that finds dunking fun and cathartic, can they still perform the function of dunking on someone who isn't a public figure in c/gossip?

                • Esoteir [he/him]
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  so it's not functionally the same in all senses?

                  • replaceable [he/him]
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    thats what functionally same means, that its not literally same

                    • Esoteir [he/him]
                      ·
                      4 days ago

                      okay so if you're going into semantics, can we agree that the term "functionally the same" means two things that have the same function?

                        • Esoteir [he/him]
                          ·
                          4 days ago

                          okay cool, now could users perform the function of dunking people who weren't public figures on the_dunk_tank?

                            • Esoteir [he/him]
                              ·
                              4 days ago

                              does rule 8 contain this text: "Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this."?

                              • replaceable [he/him]
                                ·
                                4 days ago

                                yes, but we barely if ever saw any posts that used this exception

                                • Esoteir [he/him]
                                  ·
                                  4 days ago

                                  But under that exception, it would be allowed for someone to post a bad take from comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views yes?

                                    • Esoteir [he/him]
                                      ·
                                      4 days ago

                                      okay, with that exception in mind, could users perform the function of dunking people who weren't public figures on the_dunk_tank?

                                        • Esoteir [he/him]
                                          ·
                                          4 days ago

                                          and the_dunk_tank and c/gossip have the same rules, aside from rule 8 where it now also links to counterpropaganda, correct?

                                          • replaceable [he/him]
                                            ·
                                            4 days ago

                                            Those were inattentively copied from the_dunk_tank, i removed reference to that rule 8 in c/gossip now, now instead the rule is just that subjects of a post must be a public person

                                            • Esoteir [he/him]
                                              ·
                                              4 days ago

                                              ah gotcha, it's good to set the rules up clearly

                                              so now there is no exception for posting private figures on c/gossip, right?

                                                • Esoteir [he/him]
                                                  ·
                                                  4 days ago

                                                  and the_dunk_tank held the function of providing a place where users could post a bad take from comments/posts made by a private person that have low amounts of upvotes/likes/views, provided that private person made that post or comment on other instances that are accessible from hexbear, yes?

        • REgon [they/them]
          ·
          4 days ago

          Go back to reddit, oh my god you are an insufferable lib smuglord.
          You expect others - the site culture at large - to move towards one focused on effortposts and development of rhetoric, yet you yourself cant even be fucking arsed to have basic decency. You can't even be arsed to engage with the arguments, not even in good faith, but just at all. Being a reductive dipshit is sad loser behaviour, go kiss a worm.

            • REgon [they/them]
              ·
              4 days ago

              Lol did you get tired of getting dunked on on your main? It's really funny how you can feel this strongly, but be too much of a dweeb to user your account for it

              Anyway thanks for the 30$ Please keep the accounts coming, I've got more bets lined up lol

            • REgon [they/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              That is incredibly hilarious coming from you
              People disagreeing with you makes you so mad that you instantly resort to misgendering lol. Seriously do some self-crit. People dissenting shouldn't result in you freaking out like this lol