Stuff like this is why I think giving employees stock is a horrible way of doing employee ownership. Stocks are not equitable.
Instead of personal stock ownership the business should be owned collectively through a democratic association where every employee had a right to participate and vote at the general assembly, either by the "one man, one vote" or the "one hour of labour, one vote" principle.
that’s funny, i worked for a company that was majority employee owned and this was the case. nearly all of the stock was owned by a handful of middle managers and that ownership was not extended to “regular” employees.
This is similar to what I experienced in an ESOP. The CEO was a giant asshole and no one could apparently do anything about it because he and his key supporters apparently owned enough shares to not give a shit about the rest of the company. It was pretty far from anything resembling a workplace democracy.
The biggest critique I’ve heard is that stocks are not completely equitable in distribution but that’s still better than most
deleted by creator
Stuff like this is why I think giving employees stock is a horrible way of doing employee ownership. Stocks are not equitable.
Instead of personal stock ownership the business should be owned collectively through a democratic association where every employee had a right to participate and vote at the general assembly, either by the "one man, one vote" or the "one hour of labour, one vote" principle.
deleted by creator
This is similar to what I experienced in an ESOP. The CEO was a giant asshole and no one could apparently do anything about it because he and his key supporters apparently owned enough shares to not give a shit about the rest of the company. It was pretty far from anything resembling a workplace democracy.
deleted by creator