Literally just mainlining marketing material straight into whatever’s left of their rotting brains.

  • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Most of the people in this thread seem to think humans have a unique special ability that machines can never replicate, and that comes off as faith-based anthropocentric religious thinking- not the materialist view that underlies Marxism

    First off, materialism doesn't fucking mean having to literally quantify the human soul in order for it to be valid, what the fuck are you talking about friend

    Secondly, because we do. We as a species have, from the very moment we invented written records, have wondered about that spark that makes humans human and we still don't know. To try and reduce the entirety of the complex human experience to the equivalent of an If > Than algorithm is disgustingly misanthropic

    I want to know what the end goal is here. Why are you so insistent that we can somehow make an artificial version of life? Why this desire to somehow reduce humanity to some sort of algorithm equivalent? Especially because we have so many speculative stories about why we shouldn't create The Torment Nexus, not the least of which because creating a sentient slave for our amusement is morally fucked.

    Bots do something different, even when I give them the same prompt, so that seems to be untrue already.

    You're being intentionally obtuse, stop JAQing off. I never said that AI as it exists now can only ever have 1 response per stimulus. I specifically said that a computer program cannot ever spontaneously create an input for itself, not now and imo not ever by pure definition (as, if it's programmed, it by definition did not come about spontaneously and had to be essentially prompted into life)

    I thought the whole point of the exodus to Lemmy was because y'all hated Reddit, why the fuck does everyone still act like we're on it

    • zeze@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      First off, materialism doesn't fucking mean having to literally quantify the human soul in order for it to be valid, what the fuck are you talking about friend

      Ok, so you are religious, just new-age religion instead of abrahamic.

      Yes, materialism and your faith are not compatible. Assuming the existence of a soul, with no material basis, is faith.

      • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact of all the things I wrote, your sole response is to continue to misunderstand what the fuck materialism means in a Marxist context is really fucking telling miyazaki-laugh

        • zeze@lemm.ee
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you start with the assumption that humans have a soul, and reject the notion that machines are the same for that reason then yea what is there to discuss?

          I can't disprove your faith. That's what faith is.

          How would you respond to someone that thought humanoid robots had souls, but meat-based intelligence didn't? If they assumed the first, and had zero metric for how you would ever prove the second, then theyd be giving you an impossible task.

          There's a point to a discussion when both sides agree on a rubric from determining fact from fiction (i.e. rooting it in empiricism) but there's no point when someone is dug in on their belief with zero method for ever changing it.

          If someone could point to any actual observable difference, I will adapt my beliefs to the evidence. The reverse isn't possible, because you are starting with religious assumptions, and have don' know the difference between ideas with no rooting in physical reality and actual statements about material conditions.

          • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            I used the word soul once as a shorthand for the unknown of human consciousness. Either stop being an insufferable Reddit new atheist or fuck off.