I've always considered the American Revolution a textbook example of a bougie revolution, in that a fuedal aristocrat's rule was overthrown by landowning capitalists not of the old fuedal nobility. IIRC Marx said something similar about it.
But last night a friend challenged that idea by pointing out that the fuedal base of society was de facto maintained via slavery, even if de jure there was no longer a king. In their interpretation, the war for independence wasn't actually a revolution, as the old divisions of nobility/serfs were maintained and simply rebranded along racial lines of white/Black, with indigenous peoples being considered almost completely outside the polity, similar to how many Jewish and Roma communities were regarded in Europe.
Thoughts?
Also wasn't sure if this went in history or askchapo
deleted by creator
On this site? Said unironically? And as a blanket judgment of character instead of a critique of their premise? Yeah dude, it's a shitty thing to call someone you know absolutely nothing about.
deleted by creator
:very-intelligent:
deleted by creator
So much effort to avoid saying, "I'm sorry."
deleted by creator