So then, what are we? . . . Towards such ends, we might begin (perhaps provocatively) with the list of names that indicate the thoughts and problems issuing from events that, reading history against the grain (with Benjamin), still speak to us in the present: Marx, Lenin, Luxemburg, Trotsky, Adorno. — Not much more than what is represented by these figures, but absolutely nothing less.
Who do these "intellectuals" think they are in having influence of the movement? I have never seen an organization takes seriously their thought and word (unlike other great intellectuals) so who are they writings towards? It's a self-serving vanity project by the petite-bourgeoise of society to serve their self-ego while chiding the masses.
Sounds like pretentious academic leftists.
Who do these "intellectuals" think they are in having influence of the movement? I have never seen an organization takes seriously their thought and word (unlike other great intellectuals) so who are they writings towards? It's a self-serving vanity project by the petite-bourgeoise of society to serve their self-ego while chiding the masses.