they're CIA as NYT. The author of both articles works at Stanford and looky here. https://news.stanford.edu/report/2021/02/12/faculty-senate-seeks-future-report-increased-collaboration-hoover-institution-stanford/ He's a professor of comparative literature and he originally testified AGAINST the Hoover institution taking over.
“But too much of what we have seen coming out of the Hoover has made a travesty of honest intellectual debate, because an excess of partisanship has led some Hoover fellows out of the realm of fact, science and good faith argumentation,” he said."
The CIA has done it many times before, same with the MI6 in the UK (The Greyzone has covered it and interviewed the professors themselves). They threaten to get professors fired if they don't play ball. I think this guy just went along with them after he was threatened. He's also a perfect candidate for such an article because he has an Asian-ish last name, and it seems like the CIA prefers "China bad" articles to be authored by Asian people, for whatever reason. As an aside, this is why I said maybe Chomsky is self-censoring less because he's getting old and doesn't give a fuck about CIA threats anymore.
The institution’s “purpose,” as Hoover defined it in 1959, “must be, by its research and publications, to demonstrate the evils of the doctrines of Karl Marx — whether Communism, Socialism, economic materialism, or atheism — thus to protect the American way of life from such ideologies, their conspiracies, and to reaffirm the validity of the American system.” Sounds exactly like the goal of the CIA.
Very interesting use of the word "conspiracies" here though. I wonder if that word was in vogue back then.
Source: https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-11-17/stanford-hoover-institution
no they’re literally just :amber: s politics as a magazine, you don’t need intelligence agencies to have a mix of kautskyism trotskyism and stupidpol as your editorial line and produce :jesse-wtf: content
I’ve read enough to know they’re really genuinely idiots
I'm not saying their entire staff is literally working from Langley. Just that their editorial policy is being heavily influenced by the national security state. They're free to write dumb articles as long as the main message aligns with whatever the CIA and state department are saying.
I am not aware of media whistleblowers so I don't know the details but you should look at The Greyzone's recent youtube video/article talking about MI6 suppression of academics in UK who spoke out against the false flag in Syria. They interview the professors themselves.
I just read it the article is absolutely derranged and does not claim the academic were surpressed in any way only that some idiot was collecting information on them to maybe to shame them or something, it’s also the grayzone lmao.
I’m not gonna watch a 30m video on the same topic it’s too long, I would not put all my eggs in one basket into a news source that hides their funding and themselves basically toe the editorial line of being Russian state media even if they don’t admit it. They also published an unironic article claiming philosophy tube was mi6 or whatever on top of all the anti vax stuff recently.
jacobin is CIA
I've been having this thought for a while but haven't been sure enough to say it out loud. This article is plenty enough to push me over the edge.
https://jacobin.com/2021/04/uyghur-oppression-ccp-surveillance-reeducation-war-on-terror
https://jacobin.com/2019/06/china-uyghur-persecution-concentration-camps
they're CIA as NYT. The author of both articles works at Stanford and looky here. https://news.stanford.edu/report/2021/02/12/faculty-senate-seeks-future-report-increased-collaboration-hoover-institution-stanford/ He's a professor of comparative literature and he originally testified AGAINST the Hoover institution taking over.
“But too much of what we have seen coming out of the Hoover has made a travesty of honest intellectual debate, because an excess of partisanship has led some Hoover fellows out of the realm of fact, science and good faith argumentation,” he said."
The CIA has done it many times before, same with the MI6 in the UK (The Greyzone has covered it and interviewed the professors themselves). They threaten to get professors fired if they don't play ball. I think this guy just went along with them after he was threatened. He's also a perfect candidate for such an article because he has an Asian-ish last name, and it seems like the CIA prefers "China bad" articles to be authored by Asian people, for whatever reason. As an aside, this is why I said maybe Chomsky is self-censoring less because he's getting old and doesn't give a fuck about CIA threats anymore.
The institution’s “purpose,” as Hoover defined it in 1959, “must be, by its research and publications, to demonstrate the evils of the doctrines of Karl Marx — whether Communism, Socialism, economic materialism, or atheism — thus to protect the American way of life from such ideologies, their conspiracies, and to reaffirm the validity of the American system.” Sounds exactly like the goal of the CIA.
Very interesting use of the word "conspiracies" here though. I wonder if that word was in vogue back then. Source: https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-11-17/stanford-hoover-institution
no they’re literally just :amber: s politics as a magazine, you don’t need intelligence agencies to have a mix of kautskyism trotskyism and stupidpol as your editorial line and produce :jesse-wtf: content
I’ve read enough to know they’re really genuinely idiots
https://youtu.be/FqB8Rb4bXjQ
Amber.
I'm not saying their entire staff is literally working from Langley. Just that their editorial policy is being heavily influenced by the national security state. They're free to write dumb articles as long as the main message aligns with whatever the CIA and state department are saying.
but like why and how does this work, in what way would be something unacceptable for them to publish if they have to stick to some sort of line
I am not aware of media whistleblowers so I don't know the details but you should look at The Greyzone's recent youtube video/article talking about MI6 suppression of academics in UK who spoke out against the false flag in Syria. They interview the professors themselves.
I just read it the article is absolutely derranged and does not claim the academic were surpressed in any way only that some idiot was collecting information on them to maybe to shame them or something, it’s also the grayzone lmao.
I’m not gonna watch a 30m video on the same topic it’s too long, I would not put all my eggs in one basket into a news source that hides their funding and themselves basically toe the editorial line of being Russian state media even if they don’t admit it. They also published an unironic article claiming philosophy tube was mi6 or whatever on top of all the anti vax stuff recently.
are you on the wrong site or something
the evidence is definitive. reddit worldnews is thataway
Funny of you to say this and then go on the next day to make a stand for Taiwanese independence
I’ll stop by and chat with my :cia: handler on the way over there :rat-salute: