just saw it and was obliged to share

  • Vncredleader
    ·
    2 years ago

    And yet refuting that was one of the main points of his rehabilitation.

    Written testimony from certain selected survivors, who had defied the Japanese and Manchukuo authorities and paid for their resistance through torture, was now read out. Each ended with a call for retribution. 'The Japanese and Chinese traitors must repay their blood debt. Avenge our murdered families!'

    The intended lesson was this: Pu Yi had invariably excused his past actions on the grounds that there was no way he could have opposed the Japanese. Now here were humble Manchurian workers, farmers, housewives and children who _had dared defy the Japanese and Manchukuo oppressors.

    From The Last Emperor by Edward Behr.

    • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      And yet shithead calling me a Japanese collaborator defender literally posited in his post that Puyi was merely a figurehead since 1919

      Which way western man, figurehead whose life is dependent on appeasing those actually in power, or actual monarch capable of resistance if only he weren't a "weak man"

      • Vncredleader
        ·
        2 years ago
        1. I am not defending shithead here. That statement is fucked and should be removed.

        2. Those are not the only options. He didn't have to be an actual monarch to be capable of resistance. That's the point of the above quote, people with no power and no hope of succeeding fought back, so why couldn't he? Puppet or not, useless or not, he chose to continue being a puppet for these monsters and he himself earnestly viewed himself as being a coward and collaborator. He still went along with them, he still provided a figurehead, whether refusal would have changed anything or not, he still chose to do so, which is something Pu Yu himself viewed as wrong and criminal