cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2331989

I don’t really think he knows this site’s culture at all. No one is dissuading people from reading theory lol

Show
Show

Yey or ney for him?

As someone said in the post

As far as I can tell, he's a guy who spends all his time posting about how all leftists do is post.

And this ain't the first time, Roderick's a bit terminally online, arguing against other progressives like JT (Second Thought) and Michael Hudson....

Edit:

Ok I've made a right-deviationist mistake in saying that Michael Hudson is a progressive, and indirectly agreeing with the views of the former....

I've not investigated into JT's MMT videos nor looked carefully into Hudson (I thought he was also against capitalism, turns out, only finance and feudalism..., just cares for industrial capitalism)

  • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    7 months ago

    I responded to this in my other comment but in addition I agree that neoliberalism was a poor choice. I don't think you can read much into this kind of thing unless you (a) ask for clarification and more detail and/or (b) know who he thinks is the intended audience. I don't think there's much inherently wrong with pointing out the US's missteps. The difference may be in how the message is delivered.

    • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      7 months ago

      It highly implies it’s best to reform the system into a better “industrial capitalism.” I think a Hudson supporter told me that he thinks a “purer” contradiction between the working and capitalist class could bring about socialism better, which is weird because it never has, that would take too long, and it’s a reactionary position wanting to return from a higher phase of capitalism to a lower one just like liberals (caring about small businesses).

        • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          7 months ago

          It is, because Kaukyism, the core of this idea is anti-lenin and revisionist against the USSR.

          Its a strain of 'othrodox marxism' which basically treats Marx like the bible. It also funnyily enough, while trying to claim no bias ends up inserting the authors own (wrong in my opinion) takes on it.

          It is a strain of social democracy, not communism.