• orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    ·
    8 months ago

    Had an old landlord keep my deposit when I moved out just because they could. We left the apartment absolutely spotless and never damaged anything. In fact, we added value by fixing a couple small things. Didn’t matter.

    Fuck landlords.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    ·
    8 months ago

    Double property taxes on owners, but give back a property tax credit on owner-occupants, so that the effective tax rate on owner occupants falls, and the only people paying the doubled tax rate are investors.

    Statutorily increase the tax rate and credit when owner occupancy is below 80%, and reduce the tax rate and credit when owner occupancy rises above 90%.

    • booty [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      nah, just exterminate landlords. more efficient, more ethical

      • Milksteaks [he/him]@midwest.social
        ·
        8 months ago

        Based take. You kill parasites (ticks leeches lice) not try to manage them or give them rules that they wont follow anyway. I got downvoted in a different community with the same post by a bunch of landlord bootlickers by describing what a fuckin drain landlords are on society

    • Lurker123 [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      Won’t landlords simply pass through this increased cost to tenants?

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yes, offsite landlords with traditional rental agreements will charge their tenants more. However, there are at least three options that are better for tenants and landlords alike.

        1. Land Contract. A rent-to-own agreement, recorded with the county, much like a deed.

        2. Private mortgage. Available only to individual landlords, not institutional investors.

        3. Condominium. Deeded property on the inside, rental on the outside.

        In all three, the tenant gains equity in the property over time. In all three, the terms are established at the time of the agreement, and the agreement is "permanent" in that it can only be canceled by the "tenant". The "landlord" can't arbitrarily increase the price year after year. All three offer considerably better return for the landlord after the property tax increase. The landlord and tenant convert their rental agreement to one of these options, and there is much rejoicing.

        The only traditional rental arrangement that is likely to remain widespread is where the landlord occupies one unit in a duplex, triplex, or quadplex structure. That landlord can claim the owner occupant credit for the whole property while renting out the additional units.

  • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jesus fuck the amount of limp noodles here. You're so dominated by the owner class that even your dreams are subservient.

    People need temporary housing sometimes, yes that is true. I am not sure what sort of cosmic fucking roller coaster you get on in order to go from that to privatisation of land is good actually.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      hexagon
      ·
      8 months ago

      I swear there's something about posting memes in leftymemes that triggers the libs, and they come here to vomit their bootlickin' takes.

      • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It's so sad. There are ways for things to be upkept, developed, innovated on whatever that don't involve private ownership.

        Not everything has to be owned, even if something has a profit motive things can be held in common.

        Capitalist realism is such a major bummer, people think they're being bold by asking for slightly more of the pie they baked. In a sense it is, because of how screwed we are, but like my friends... we baked the damn pie.