Or does he just have some hot/weird takes that got him in trouble?
Someone on Reddit told me he (Rovics) thinks Matthew Heimbach has reformed, for instance. Reading Heimbach's Wikipedia page he still sounds like a massive Nazbol to me (emphasis on the Naz)
I struggle to believe Rovics could make a mistake like that. I've listened to all his music, never seen him miss in a song that I can think of. Also talked to him prior to learning this and he seems cool to me
I'm suspended on Reddit for 3 days. That's why I'm asking here for now. Most charitable thing might be to ask Rovics to explain himself, but I'd have to make a Twitter account again
i mean he did a song about cancel culture lol. idk he seems fine to me but i wouldn't be that surprised.
I have some extremely "bourgeois" opinions (most +"worst" shared with Schopenhauer, not libertine French philosophers btw let's be clear). Bad enough for an insta-ban here and on r/communism and excommunication from real life organisations, et.
Antintalism btw. Thing is I don't go around telling people not to have kids, life sucks, etc. It' unproductive
*In a nod to libertarianism and convention: do whatever the fuck you want. Most people I respect have kids. Marx and Mao had many.
I'll only ever argue this shit if requested. Or on BadPhilosophy maybe. But Join The Church of Euthanasia if you at all agree. Chris Korda rules. Never met her
r/antin*talism had to split in two pre COVID btw because most people there are just sad people who understand one truth by accident.
Some of them are verging on eco-fascism. Thing is they don't do anything irl. Crueler to let the worst ones them live or kill themselves.
Good ones ought to be driven left naturally, but depression is a hell of a neurotoxin
antinatalism isn't bourgeois, it's just an enormous self-suck
Fact