NATO allies are discussing
Which ones?
NATO officials are discussing
Which ones?
What a lousy article, you can't know if it's the proposition talked by the important people or some nutjobs from Baltics like usual in case of such idiocy, or maybe it's just a journo duck.
tfw "rules-based international order" means we're allowed to break those rules whenever we want but our enemies aren't allowed to do the same
China never would have allowed these transfers to begin with. And if they did happen they would have been reversed with no recourse to the foreign investor. China has actually screwed foreign investors in a million different ways without any real response from the west.
Yes, they broke the rules the West invented and the West complains about. Now the West is breaking the rules, undermining their entire position that all nations must follow the rules or be punished.
NATO, obviously. How is this even a question?
Why would China start a war when not starting wars has been working out for them for so long?
China doesn't have a finacial capitalist class that could "lobby" the government to "find new markets" as their banks are nationalized. They also don't install puppets in foreign governments that shape policy for surplus value extraction or impose capitalism. Please consider reading theory
The sheer ignorance displayed by these dimwits is truly astounding, as they fail to grasp the profound extent to which their economies are dependent on China in reality. It's akin to a pampered house cat that believes it reigns supreme within its domain, oblivious to the fact that its sustenance originates from elsewhere entirely.
