• knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is just a really weird click-bait listicle type post with a couple facts and a couple incorrect assumptions.

    • tintory@lemm.ee
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hard disagree; when I read it, all the links are working, seem to verify what the writer is saying, and all information can be collaborated with other sources

      Edit: I seen this style before, Axios and Morning Brew does something similar

      • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        The information may well be true, but it is missing vital context presented in the articles linked. I went into this in my other reply on this thread.

  • RNAi [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    www.stoppopulationdecline.org

    Why?

    • tintory@lemm.ee
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why not, as long it means being against austerity?

      Hell, the article is critical for the CCP not spending more on social services.

      • RNAi [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Am all against austerity, but that page name reeks of weird brainworms. OK I'm gonna read it just to sample their insanity.

        • tintory@lemm.ee
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You just gave me a killer name for a community!

          AllAgainstAusterity

          Edit: I made the community https://lemm.ee/c/allagainstausterity

  • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    Academics admit births could fall to 7 million

    He noted that the number of newborns this year could be as low as 7 million.

    Kinda subtle but the original source just lists 7 million as a lower limit, but this weirdo website cites it as the prediction. They also use the pronoun "he," but as far as I know the more famous Qiao Jie from Peking University is a woman. Might want something straight from that conference, which the Global Times doesn't provide even a name.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    ·
    1 year ago

    7 million new humans in a single country per year is A LOT of goddamn people.

    Imagine a major city's worth of people suddenly appearing every single year. It's completely unsustainable.

    • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      It's not unsustainable, it's below the replacement rate. Even if it were slightly above, China has proven to be more than capable of increasing everyone's quality of life while managing a rising population.

      That's about 0.5% growth of the national population, or 5 births per thousand people. Less than a third of the global average of 18 births per thousand. Put into that perspective, it's really quite small.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, they also could be having 90% of a major city's worth of people dying every year, but I haven't looked up the exact number.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        ·
        1 year ago

        Someone said around 10 million die per year. But old people die. Everywhere.

        But they are “replaced” by 7 million+ babies.

        Let's not forget that China STILL limits the number of children you can have, and limited families to one child for decades before the limit was raised to two, then three. They don't really want more people.