I think that's the only thing I dislike about rust. Not having to use * to dereference but later having to use is tad confusing. I know it's still clever solution but in this case I prefer c++'s straightforward consistency.
Using ampersand never was problematic for me.
I thought it was randomly adding Send and Sync traits to function signatures until rustc is happy.
Follow up of: "Mmm... should I put lifecycle annotation in these 10 structs or just use and Rc and call it a day?". Rc and Box FTW.
Yeah, popped in the comments to say the same.
I dont know what my damage is with pointers…
honestly with Go in general I’m in a perpetual cycle of being annoyed with it and then immediately being amazed when I find some little trick for efficiency - with stringer interfaces and the like
