Permanently Deleted
Where in the article does it say anything about nuclear weapons?
Damn you forced me to read that inane ramblings because you asked a good question. It don't mention nukes anywhere, but it sorta implies it by singling out a heavily fortified positions with concentration of Russian troops and mentioning Blinken and thus USA don't think capturing Crimea is possible in current situation.
Also bloody fuck even in this super biased shit they openly say things like that, i need some mental scrubbing after that:
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently proposed his 10-part peace plan to end the war in Ukraine to a peace conference attended by 40 countries. The most notable absence from the conference was Russia
Also that 10-point plan is probably the most damn insane peace proposition i ever seen, basically demanding capitulation from Russia. And it also bosses NATO around lol.
Sorry to put you through that comrade. The title just really didn't seem to fit to me, and we really don't need misinformation here.
No problem, also now i see it's not even in the "World News" community, but in "Shitposting".
man its a sarcasm , if west forces Ukraine to attack Crimea it will be nothing sort of a nuke war in future.
Ever since Catherine the Great conquered Crimea in 1783 and established Sevastopol as its principal naval base, Crimea has been key to Russian military strategy. It was transferred to Ukraine in 1954 when it was part of the USSR. Then, when the USSR was dissolved in 1991, Ukraine kept Crimea.
This was unforgivable for Putin, who has long wanted to restore the USSR. In March 2014, Russia annexed Crimea and declared Sevastopol a federal city. Approximately 800,000 Russians have moved into Crimea since then. Facing constant bombardments from Ukraine from just across a narrow border, would make life unbearable for them, and for Putin.
lol ... Yeah what kind of fuckery is this ? 800K Russians moved into Crimea where water supply was short ?
