Murder makes the intent sound more petty; less important, more personal, and less political than it really is
Assassination indicates political intent and societal effect, and even a sketchy history of skeletons behind the assassinated that led to this
But the cultural hegemonic capitalist lib and con media don't wanna hear anything about such history.
As a Brazilian, this makes me wonder what would be the equivalent terms in Portuguese, because "murder" translates to "assassinato" and "assassination" also translates to "assassinato".
Isn't "homicídio" more like a broad term which includes unintentional deaths (which we'd call as "homicídio culposo")?
Both of the terms "murder" and "assassination" imply intention, with the intention behind an "assassination" being a political/ideological one rather than the intention behind a "murder" (which would be more personally-oriented intentional homicide).
My question is because I can't remember of a Portuguese term that carries a political/ideological sense when referring someone killing another. Portuguese-speaking media outlets here in Brazil often use "morte" e "assassinato" interchangeably, even though "morte" is an even-broader term referring to "death".
Perhaps the Brazilian media lacks an equivalent word, too. "Globo" (one of the major media outlets here), for example, is using the term "assassinato":
*removed externally hosted image*
Even UOL, another major media outlet which is said to be more left-leaning, is also using the term "assassinato":
*removed externally hosted image*
So, as the OP said, these headlines, especially in Portuguese, "makes it sound unwarranted".
I feel like if you go by this logic "self defense" would be the preferred term
Money goes in, money goes out. All the while, a CEO croaks loud.
I don't think it matters. Both terms have their strengths. Using the term "assassinated" elevates the victim, which works to justify the unequal allocation of resources for investigation of a rich guy's death.
Also the term "murder" doesn't imply justification, only that you killed someone on purpose.
Murder implies that it was unlawful, which is technically true, but I don't like the idea of ceding that ground.
Using the term "assassinated" elevates the victim,
More than his role has been? Assassinated puts questions on why high-level figures like him get targeted, and these questions are uncomfortable, to say the least
Remember, not all assassinations were booed by the general public (see the fascist general Luis Carrero Blanco and see how he's SO elevated in post-Francoist Spain)
He was only briefly elevated, followed by a swift return to earth
And that sketchy history is medical insurance rentierism
