cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/1891139

Archived version: https://archive.ph/OvFse
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230825144949/https://www.euronews.com/culture/2023/08/23/billboards-featuring-onlyfans-model-ruled-not-overtly-sexual-by-uk-advertising-watchdog

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      ·
      10 months ago

      On one hand, I find nothing wrong with the photograph.

      On the other hand, I’m sick of fucking OnlyFans spam online, it’s disgusting to see more spam in real life.

      Also billboards as a whole can get fucked.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      ·
      10 months ago

      It's completely tame. There are far more sexual images in just about any direction. It's only because people know there's actual nakedness being advertised that anyone has a problem with it. And that's just silly.

        • venusenvy47@lemdro.id
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don't really have questions about OF beyond getting context for the billboard. In the US I don't see porn stars advertising in such everyday places. I have certainly seen billboards that are similar to the one shown in this article, but those are from companies with a big advertising budget like Victoria's Secret, as you mention. I think porn stars are generally not wealthy enough to have a big advertising budget for billboards.

  • Dom Poose@lemm.ee
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not only did the billboard work, but now that news outlets are posting it, with her @ and all, she’s likely getting so much more attention/subs.

    Genius.

  • loathesome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    10 months ago

    Environmental activists Global Witness later took over three of the poster sites and transformed them into ‘OilyFans’ billboards, to comment on the pay package of BP chief executive Bernard Looney, whose earnings went from £4.5 million (€5.2 million) to £10 million (€11.6 million) last year.

    Good bit