For the record, I love my bike and don't own a car. However, the local cycling "activists" in my community are from the same mold as the YIMBY, neoliberal urbanist types. Overwhelmingly white, PMC and childless, who view bicycling and bike infrastructures as the harbinger for livable cites.
When you're a coder or social media marketing douche sitting on an ergonomic chair for 8 hours, cycling for five minutes to and from your loft is an ideal arrangement. However, cycling is a lot less attractive to a blue collar worker who has to travel to a exurb for their grueling 9 hour retail or Amazon warehouse shift standing on their feet. They would much rather nap on the bus after a shift than push pedals for 5 miles.
There is significant research that bike lanes are a trojan horse for gentrification and neoliberal housing development.
In my mid-size city, the twittersphere about local city politics is disproportionately geared towards cycling. It's become a cool kids club for PMCs to get involved in municipal politics, while ignoring much more desperate issues like homelessness and police brutality.
You know, I never thought of the hill factor. Like the area I live in has pretty consistent bike lane coverage but it's hilly. The only bikers I usually see on the roads are the hardcore types, with the body suits and such
Yeah every time someone puts bike lanes here, that's the only people you see there, because the city is literally built on a bunch of rocky hills.
Motherfuckers should be putting down charming SF style street cars instead of road lanes for sickos to show off in Lycra