I have it on good authority that posting screencaps of this account may be cheating.

I don’t have the original but I got it from: https://twitter.com/gunganstrangler/status/1337766952924827650?s=21

    • Rodentsteak [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      tbh she's a fascinating character. Her weird as fuck family and her somehow even weirder scandals are perfect popcorn entertainment.

      • Rem [she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        I like the one where the sex worker whose whole thing was looking like the queen got hired as part of a palace intrigue thing to make some government bureaucrat think he was having an affair with the Marie Antoinette. Or something like that.

    • DalaiLamarxist [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I wrote a 50 page paper for my history degree thesis on the Jacobins justice system. While there were undeniably flaws in the system which can be ascribed to the messy often imperfect nature of revolutions, I read countless primary and secondary sources and concluded, the Jacobins did absolutely nothing wrong.

  • Rodentsteak [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    SHE DID NOT SAY IT AT ALL. SHE SAID NOTHING ABOUT BRIOCHE, OR CAKE, OR ANYTHING. IT'S FROM A BOOK WHERE SHE ISN'T NAMED, INDEED NO ONE IS NAMED BECAUSE IT'S SAID BY A NAMELESS CHARACTER AS AN OFFHANDED REMARK TO JUSTIFY A BIT OF INDULGENCE. NO ONE IS EVEN TALKING ABOUT REVOLUTION OR STARVATION IN THAT CHAPTER, IT'S A DUDE JUSTIFYING SPLURGING IN AN IMAGINED CONVERSATION.

  • AlexandairBabeuf [they/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Marie "Dress budget larger than entire provinces" Antoinette is actually just being scapegoated for decadence!

    • Rodentsteak [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      AKSHUALLY her primary extravagance was her hairdresser, who became the equivalent of a millionaire and bought like... opera houses... with the money he got from her. His primary job was to cover up her balding and thin hair (Which tbf must suck as a queen) with extravagant nonsense.

        • Rodentsteak [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Fake news. She had an entire village built in her backyard, including a mill, a manor house with a boudoir, a dairy, a barn, a dovecote and an associated pointless marble decorative building in the style of a shrine to aphrodite.

            • Rodentsteak [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              Only insofar as you consider the "Queen’s House" a palace. The place is called "Hameau de la Reine" (The queen's village"). The entire thing is built around a lake with a bunch of purpose built cottages, and is entirely ludicrous.

              It also fit within one corner of her backyard

              • Rodentsteak [he/him]
                ·
                4 years ago

                And once again I want to emphasise that it was a fully functioning farm with full time staff to maintain it, with a herd of cows, pigs, various fowl, and a field which supplied fruit to the palace, and it was in one corner of her backyard.

        • cilantrofellow [any]
          hexagon
          ·
          4 years ago

          This is why I fight for FALGSC, so we can all know that joy.

        • shitstorm [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Versailles famously smelled like shit all the time. They just let wild exotic animals walk around the outside all the time.

  • cilantrofellow [any]
    hexagon
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Here’s a struggle session for everyone: Let’s grant that Marie Antoinette was a trafficked child bride, and should ultimately be seen as a victim of monarchy writ large. That should then apply to all children raised within royalty, over generations. They are all victims of their status.

    My take: mostly they’re cognizant humans responsible for their actions, with relatives who occasionally disowned the system providing proof of redemption, so fuck ’em. But we must honor the legacy of the Russian Cosmists and revive the originators of each dynasty so we can kill them again, extra hard.

    Please argue with me.

    • Jorick [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Marie Antoinette knowingly conspired with foreign powers to bring down the revolution, therefore she got what she deserved. I am also going to repeat myself, but Robespierre should've been less lenient.

    • DasRav [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      She is as innocent as any rich asshole today who inherited their wealth, only to then keep all of it for themselves. So not innocent at all.

      Also, why do we focus on Marie Antoinette here? Let's talk about all those peasants that were fucked in twenty ways every day. By the standards of the time, saying Marie Antoinette had a rough life before she got revolutioned is fucking stupid. Sure, things sucked back then for everyone, but I daresay it sucked measurably less for the nobility.

      • Rem [she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yeah, any peasant woman had to deal with being treated as a piece of property and didn't live in a palace the size of a village.

        When bread prices skyrocketed and the crown did nothing, the women of Paris marched into Versailles and forced the royal family out of their little opulent hideaway, they made their demands impossible to ignore. It's pretty clear which is the feminist side to take here.

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Sure, but is it worth it to leave a threat of a counter revolution aiming to restore a monarchy, just to spare a few lives?

      • cilantrofellow [any]
        hexagon
        ·
        4 years ago

        My weakness is trying to suggest some leniency for young children, but I’ve seen this movie before.

        • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Thats a good weakness to have comrade. I get the pragmatic arguments behind why killing the Romanov kids was necessary, but it still just fucks me up because they were just kids. (Also, Puyi kinda fucks up the whole pragmatic necessity argument right?)

          • FaZe_oswald [any]
            ·
            4 years ago

            puyi's situation was different because mao wasn't fighting against monarchists, he was fighting against republicans. plus his association with the japanese regime made him so vile that no one would've wanted to put him back on the throne anyways. and, on top of that, he wasn't returned to china from the USSR until after the communists had already won the revolution. puyi's case is an interesting one for sure but i don't really think that it is universal

            • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
              ·
              4 years ago

              Yeah, I get all that. I prefer to believe that there was a way around killing the Romanov kids but I get that revolutions are messy.

              • cilantrofellow [any]
                hexagon
                ·
                4 years ago

                I feel like the worst part of that is not because of the kids but because of their relative’s countries and armies.

          • Pezevenk [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            Afaik the Bolsheviks didn't consider it necessary, no one has ever managed to find some kind of command from higher ups given to kill the Romanov children or even to execute the Romanovs on the spot.

            • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              It was a decision voted by Yekaterinburg Soviet, when the Whites had come close to the city.

              +1 to decentralization.

    • TheBroodian [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      revive the originators of each dynasty so we can kill them again, extra hard.

      Video games of the future where Unreal Tournament combined with that shitty movie "Gamer", except instead of Gerard Butler, it's Marie Antoinette, Czar Nicholas III and Obama

  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    My favorite part honestly is calling them terrorists. While technically true, most people don't use the label terrorist unless there is a nonviolent way to bring about change, which there literally isn't in an absolute monarchy.

    • Jorick [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      "This movie is dedicated to the brave French freedom fighters".

    • Rem [she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      People on the lib left like to point out that white extremists are basically never labeled terrorists (which fair enough) so I think that's what she's going for here? Ultimately terrorist is a loaded term no matter what, and one that inherently exists to justify the security state (or in this case a fucking monarchy lol), so I'd rather square that circle by not calling anyone a terrorist rather than asking for white people to get sent to CIA torture sites as well.

      • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yeah it's a dumb term. Terrorism is a tactic that has been used throughout history, sometimes justifiably, oftentimes not

        • Elohim [comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          There’s also a huge difference between massacring random civilians and targeted insurrection towards a powerful enemy, yet both get called terrorism.

    • LibsEatPoop2 [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I think it's cuz they sympathize with the individual child and forget that the masses have many, many children too. this is just a consequence of having so much propaganda and culture focused around the nobility rather than from the view of the people.

        • LibsEatPoop2 [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Ooh that's good. I love reading prose like this. I would love to read him more.

          It's also interesting just how many details we know about the famous historical emperors and compare that to how little is known about the peasants and the people. Everyone lives an eventful life, filled with enough details to write books about it, yet the masses are lumped together and the kings given their own histories. I don't know. Whenever I read earlier literature, it always bothers me just how much is centered around the rulers.

  • richietozier4 [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    She's not wrong about the brioche, the only thing the french love more than that is attacking jews and their government