Paul was also the source of a lot of the stuff about racism being bad and caring for the poor
Peter writes in the Bible about Paul being hard to understand. His work is often taken to justify bad things by people who started out believing those bad things and use what he wrote to justify them
TLDR I think Paul gets misinterpreted a lot by people with pardon the pun bad faith
If he lead a slaughter of the Nazarenes so he could wear their nascent sect like a grim bloody trophy, but also said some nice things, he may have been the of his time.
Feeling bad about wiping out a people and wearing their religion like a costume to put a smiley face on a custom Sol Invictus/Mithra hybrid cult still isn't doing it for me.
That's really ahistoric Paul did not wipe out the early Christians. If he did anything it was spread Christianity so much in Rome and Greece that it somewhat lost touch with its Jewish origins but Paul was anything but an antisemite having himself come from a Jewish background and frequently preaching against any form of racial hatred
Also the Mithras stuff is an urban legend and the similarities pretty much begin and end with rituals involving wine and being popular in the Roman army and Christianity didn't catch on in the Roman army until after the relevant time period either. Additionally it is bizarre to conclude that Saul a Jewish religious authority would have suddenly decided to go from persecuting what he viewed as a heretical Jewish sect and instead convert it into a cult of a god popular in an army that he wasn't in and was occupying his country. Also the early Christians weren't wiped out by Saul or even nearly so. The early disciples of Jesus like Peter were still alive and didn't take issue with Paul's teaching either
I'll check what you're telling me in a little while; I won't rule out that I heard incorrectly. Admittedly some of what I thought I knew goes decades back to college-era hearsay.
Christianity has been this way for over 1700 years at least
Paul betrayed the Nazarene revolution!
Paul was also the source of a lot of the stuff about racism being bad and caring for the poor
Peter writes in the Bible about Paul being hard to understand. His work is often taken to justify bad things by people who started out believing those bad things and use what he wrote to justify them
TLDR I think Paul gets misinterpreted a lot by people with pardon the pun bad faith
If he lead a slaughter of the Nazarenes so he could wear their nascent sect like a grim bloody trophy, but also said some nice things, he may have been the
of his time.
Pretty fundamental to the whole thing since the beginning was that people can change and become better.
Plus he definitely drastically changed his views since his conversion
Feeling bad about wiping out a people and wearing their religion like a costume to put a smiley face on a custom Sol Invictus/Mithra hybrid cult still isn't doing it for me.
That's really ahistoric Paul did not wipe out the early Christians. If he did anything it was spread Christianity so much in Rome and Greece that it somewhat lost touch with its Jewish origins but Paul was anything but an antisemite having himself come from a Jewish background and frequently preaching against any form of racial hatred
Also the Mithras stuff is an urban legend and the similarities pretty much begin and end with rituals involving wine and being popular in the Roman army and Christianity didn't catch on in the Roman army until after the relevant time period either. Additionally it is bizarre to conclude that Saul a Jewish religious authority would have suddenly decided to go from persecuting what he viewed as a heretical Jewish sect and instead convert it into a cult of a god popular in an army that he wasn't in and was occupying his country. Also the early Christians weren't wiped out by Saul or even nearly so. The early disciples of Jesus like Peter were still alive and didn't take issue with Paul's teaching either
I'll check what you're telling me in a little while; I won't rule out that I heard incorrectly. Admittedly some of what I thought I knew goes decades back to college-era hearsay.
Saul was probably going to wipe out the early Christians but then he converted on the road to Damascus
I already knew the "official" story. But I picked up a lot of contrary information about Saul/Paul in college and never really examined it since.