Article is 2 years old, but it's a happy article and I wanted to post it anyways.
EDIT: For anyone curious, here's a link to her Douyin page: https://www.douyin.com/user/MS4wLjABAAAAC-deOgCmNN2bIugq3od6LBI-Ws7Pn8EuLwWBjZg-ghg It says she has 11.151 million followers and 170 million likes, which is awesome.
AES makes progress while the imperial core regresses 🫡
Yep, give it 20-30 years and I bet that China will be the LGBTQ+ safe haven. For the shitty things China does, I am vastly more willing to tolerate them specifically because they keep working on making them better.
In shithole America, problems are ignored and the good things they opposed for 50 years get propagandized even while politicians are stripping them away.
China already is the LGBTQ+ safe haven, as are Cuba and Vietnam. I think LGBTQ+ rights are about more than corporate sponsorships and pride parades. The question is: are LGBTQ+ people free to be themselves? Are they committing suicide in droves? Are they being targeted by death squads? While their situation is not perfect in AES countries, I do think that it’s actually already better.
At the core of queer liberation today are at least some rights that are at odds with the demands of the austerity-addicted, tyrannic capitalist class, such as free and accessible healthcare for transition, reproductive medicine, HIV prevention and treatment; encompassing protections from discrimination in areas like working and housing, and a protection from targeted harassment campaigns that is fundamentally contrarian to how the free speech paradigm works in a media landscape dominated by the most reactionary stratas of fossil capital. Moreover, from my lived experience as a trans woman i can say that the way liberal democracy organizes majorities and manufactures consent is absolutely terrifying when you're part of a group that's probably less than 1% of the population, unless that less than 1% group is the bourgeoisie.
Now the problem here and the reason that for the last decades, queer communities were more visible in the imperial core than in the periphery, is that liberal democracy makes grassroots organizing outside of sanctioned party structures a lot easier than the societal model you see in the siege socialism AES states necessarily had to practice. That frequently meant that widespread societal acceptance and queer organizing lagged significantly behind the legal situation of queer people in AES states. The East German DDR legalized gay sex a full year before the West German BRD followed suit with a partial legalization that only caught up to the DDR's laws 4 years after "reunification". For trans people, the situation after the West annexed their home country was dire, as it led to a drastic worsening of their legal situation - the DDR did not have the forced sterilizations and forced divorces that were part of changing your name and gender ID in the BRD until the 2010s. But societal acceptance of gay and lesbian people reliably polled higher in the West than in the East, because the West had a very public, thriving (and, unfortunately, also very commercialized) gay subculture, whereas the DDR, apart from a few gay work groups within the party, did not have anything but clandestine cruising spots until the first state-funded gay bars opened up in Berlin in the 1980s. As cool as state-funded gay bars are, that's a bit late to the party for Berlin. When we look at the state of Eastern Europe today, it's a sad reality that after the collapse of AES there, the reactionary backlash had it easy to roll back progress in queer liberation, with the main exception being Slovenia, which during Tito's years, when it was part of Yugoslavia, had a very active, well-organized queer community and was the first region in Europe to host a queer film festival. Up until today, it is the most accepting nation out of all the post-AES ones in that part of the world.
As materialists, we are quick to dismiss the liberal talking points of visibility and representation and awareness, and they are indeed pointless if they are mistaken to be an end in themselves and lead to no material changes beyond, but from lived experience i can tell you that it matters if people are familiar with queer experiences. It's the only way to create a welcoming, open social environment that allows you to thrive as a queer person, and in the past AES states frequently struggled with that part in spite of political goodwill, while many places in the West succeeded at this in spite of queer communities still having to fight our governments tooth and nail for every tiny bit of legal and political recognition. Make no mistake, queer liberation in the west is a success story of the tenacity, endurance and ingenuity of our own community, not something that our supposedly so benevolent freedom-loving governments handed down to us. Let no rainbow capitalist and no warmongering liar who dares to put the NATO star on one of our pride flags deceive you: We do not have our rights due to western values, we have them because of decades of organization and struggle against the repressive cishetnormative morals of the West, and it's simply that this struggle is a lot easier when your government doesn't have to worry with every NGO if it is a front for the CIA working on a coup. The West's efforts at regime change actively undermine the possibility for queer self liberation in the post-colonial world. It is easy to scapegoat queer activists as Western agents when our plight is instrumentalized by imperialists the way it is today.
So what's the way forward here? We can look to Cuba for the answer. Not only have they just trained 10 doctors in gender reassignment surgery, doctors who, in the usual Cuban tradition, will help people all across LatAm with their knowledge, people who could otherwise never afford such surgeries. Cuba also has demonstrated a clear willingness to win the people over and spread acceptance of queer rights, as we saw before the referendum for the new family code. Their information campaign successfully countered the opposition of reactionary actors like the Catholic church and made the people of Cuba approve of what's probably the most progressive family law in the world. Socialist states do not only need to give legal recognition to queer people, the party needs to play an active role in engaging with and provifing a platform for the queer community, as for all groups among the masses that have been marginalized under capitalism. This is essential to build a truyl unified, solidaric society working towards communism.
Good post
That’s such a good term
ofc it is, it's from
The statistics out of the Beijing LGBT center are a little better than America and there are different hurdles to get over, but I think you're overstating things a bit here
Main thing is the party bans discriminatory language in the news about any group, so you don't have insane people talking about trans stuff 24/7 to incite genocide.
deleted by creator
Dug into it, and there wasn't any reasons given, however some people that used to go there speculated the following:
The US Consulate was invited to speak at the center a couple of times... which seems uh... like an extremely bad decision. I've talked to people in China involved in centers and that is a HUGE no-no.
There were conflicts with neighboring buildings that led to them being kicked out of their building.
deleted by creator
Yeah there are plenty of groups that still operate in Beijing, obviously, at least 10 major ones from what I can tell. So while it does suck, its overblown that people think this is the end of LGBT activities in Beijing in western media.
deleted by creator
If you got the know how to get around firewalls, text translators are very good these days and are a nice crutch. I mostly know basic chinese words that are useful on websites like 'search' or 'menu'
deleted by creator
Unfortunately, a co-founder of the Beijing LGBT Center, Wan Yanhai, had ties to the NED, which the government has been cracking down on more recently. Yanhai had a fellowship with them. He was also one of the signatories of the Charter 08 manifesto, which called for the end of CCP rule and privatization of all state-owned enterprises. Also doesn’t really help that there are still some out of touch socially conservative boomers in the government, who believe LGBT activism to be a western plot. China is still overall making progress in LGBT rights, especially with younger Chinese being generally very supportive, but there are still occasional setbacks along the way like this.
I'm pretty sure the one you're thinking about allegedly had a director with ClA connections which was the stated reason for the shutdown
deleted by creator
Yeah apparently. Wasn't aware of that, but they have a research paper floating around on Chinese LGBT statistics. No western agency discusses the reasoning for the shut down, which is usually given. Shanghai Pride and many other orgs are still operating though. I'll dig a bit to see if I can turn up anything.
deleted by creator
Are they that good in China? Is that a recent development? I would agree with Cuba but would you mind providing sources for China and Vietnam?
Luna Oi on twitter has been talking about Vietnam moving in the direction of Cuba with regard to LGBTQ+ issues. That’s about as specific as I can get.
I can't, for the life of me, find it. But there's a short documentary that I watched about a year ago on YouTube, called something like "A Day of Transition", which was about trans people in China, and the recent strides that have been made in areas like employment protections.
So things are definitely moving in a positive direction.
Afaik they’re like around 2000s USA in regards to lgbt issues, wouldn’t be too surprised if civil unions (or hell even marriages) became a thing there in the next ten years
what kind of shitty things does China do?
They don't allow same-sex marriage for one. You can get a legalized guardianship but that's paperwork and offers less legal rights and recognition.
The average LGBTQ+ person in China may be better off than the average person in America but if you remove the south I don't think that'd hold true anymore.
fair enough; I figured "does" implied that they were actively doing something malicious, but there are certainly many issues that still need to be resolved
But at what cost?
(i work for the nyt)