• tintory@lemm.ee
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree for the most part.

      I been reading these guys for a bit and they seem to be hostile toward austerity and NIMBYism so far

      • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be honest, I can't see anybody who isn't way too worried about phenotypes and skull shapes genuinely caring about birthrates, regardless of what else they write.

        • tintory@lemm.ee
          hexagon
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait what?

          I read nothing in this site talking about that right wing nonsense

          Hell, they attack the Tories for cutting spending

          • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            I'm saying that anybody who thinks "declining birth rates" merits writing articles or making social media posts, they're likely also racists.

            • jack [he/him, comrade/them]M
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are pretty straightforward, non-racist, economic reasons you be concerned about it. It's an issue China is grappling with very directly, and not because they're neo-Nazis.

              • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Aren't they increasing automation in response? China also allowed provinces with larger minority populations to have more children than predominantly Han provinces, didn't they? I think they get a pass.

            • tintory@lemm.ee
              hexagon
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe? I haven’t seen anything to say that he is racist, or even share any sympathy for traditional right wing policy