• tintory@lemm.ee
    hexagon
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree for the most part.

    I been reading these guys for a bit and they seem to be hostile toward austerity and NIMBYism so far

    • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be honest, I can't see anybody who isn't way too worried about phenotypes and skull shapes genuinely caring about birthrates, regardless of what else they write.

      • tintory@lemm.ee
        hexagon
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait what?

        I read nothing in this site talking about that right wing nonsense

        Hell, they attack the Tories for cutting spending

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I'm saying that anybody who thinks "declining birth rates" merits writing articles or making social media posts, they're likely also racists.

          • jack [he/him, comrade/them]M
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are pretty straightforward, non-racist, economic reasons you be concerned about it. It's an issue China is grappling with very directly, and not because they're neo-Nazis.

            • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Aren't they increasing automation in response? China also allowed provinces with larger minority populations to have more children than predominantly Han provinces, didn't they? I think they get a pass.

          • tintory@lemm.ee
            hexagon
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe? I haven’t seen anything to say that he is racist, or even share any sympathy for traditional right wing policy