• Fuckass
    ·
    edit-2
    10 个月前

    deleted by creator

    • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
      ·
      11 个月前

      Russia's military strength has been degrading since the war began. How long do you wait with your ally losing strength? Sure, you could prop him up but then that's a drain on your economy. If you postpone indefinitely, the situation may change to be even more unfavorable.

      • Fuckass
        ·
        edit-2
        10 个月前

        deleted by creator

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        11 个月前

        Generally speaking, China benefits from stalling for as long as possible. The power of the imperial core is waning, so if China can navigate things such that the US -- due to its own economic dependency on imperialism -- crumbles to a much lower stature without the US launching nukes, then its influence in the world will become a shadow of what it was and reunification without firing a shot may be viable.

        • culpritus [any]
          ·
          edit-2
          11 个月前

          without the US launching nukes

          I was just talking about this today. China is leading towards a multi-polar world very effectively, but the US is the only nation to have used nukes in history. Really puts things in stark relief.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]
            ·
            11 个月前

            Plus the leadership in DC are senile psychopaths who have at best a loose grasp on world affairs. And that's just the Democrats. The GOP are increasingly all fascists completely divorced from reality. Real "Sick old man" hours, except unlike the Ottomans DC has enough nukes to flash-fry the planet if the wrong corpse-lich has a stroke at the right time.