Unpopular opinion(?): Barclay’s fantasies weren’t the creepy thing about this episode. Nothing wrong with having weird fantasies, as long as you keep them to yourself, and Barclay never meant for anyone else to see his holodeck programs.
The unsettling thing about this episode, to me, is the fact that the holodeck apparently doesn’t have any usage restrictions on the likenesses of real people. They really ought to have an opt-in system for allowing others to simulate you on the holodeck.
I'm just trying to compare this to real-world equivalents and honestly your point keeps getting more and more true to me. If you were to police someone from having fantasies about someone then that is just thought crime. The Holodeck is just an extension of your imagination, or at least it can be, so provided it's private then there's no reason to have anything against it.
So real-world. You start writing a story with the help of ChatGPT. It has a bunch of numerous open-ended ways of going through it so there is a level of interaction. The story involves real world people but they are based loosely on their real world selves, mostly focusing on perceived personality traits. Not famous people either but people you work with and are close to. So far so good. Using CG you make visual representation of these people. A little 'odd' but not illegal. I don't see it as immoral or unethical either considering it's a private fantasy. Someone then walks in and sees it and has an emotional reaction. But yet again there's nothing wrong about that. Just because they discovered it doesn't mean that it was wrong to do so. It sucks that the person feels that way but it wasn't about them. It was about the person who was fantasizing.
So I also popped this episode on while typing this and was skipping throughout. I forgot about one bit which relates to your 'real unsettling thing'. Riker says that creating versions of crew on the holodeck was against protocol. LaForge points out that there isn't any protocol against it and given his past experience he would definitely know whether that was true or not. Riker then says that there should be protocol against it. We've also seen Mariner do it on the Cerritos. The Holo-Whateverthefuck on La Sirena. I'm sure there are other examples too that just aren't coming to mind at the moment. So Starfleet really doesn't give a shit whether you remake someone on holodeck or not. Private sector really doesn't give a shit either given Rios/Sevens ship.
I like your idea of an opt-in system. "Please select all genres and roles you are willing to have your holo participate in." Then it's just like a 150 point list of all kinds of random shit from "Tourist" to "Murder Victim" to "Red Shirt".
That was Boimler. Mariner just appropriated his program for her own purposes. She even initially objects to the fact that he based the characters off the logs of the crew.
Ah yeah you're right. It's been a hot minute since I've seen the episode. However, if I remember correctly, the reason he was making the holodeck program was to simulate crew for interviews. At least he was trying to make them as realistic as possible for a genuinely noble reason. He just happened to do something mildly horrific to get it done.
I swear, my logs on any Starfleet ship would be something like "Nice day today. I had soup." "Today I drew an art." "If a woodchuck could chuck wood..."
No. My argument is not. My argument is something else entirely. Something that you previously quoted three comments ago so I'd really appreciate it if you didn't make shit up and then shove those words down my throat.
My argument is, and has always been, that the intentions were noble. He went into wanting to further his career. As we've seen time and time again with Boimler, the dude is painfully head over heels in love with the ideals of Starfleet. For standing up for whats right but also for committing himself to what he can do. Is he the best officer? Absolutely not. Does he make constant bad decisions? Absolutely. But he routinely puts Starfleet and everyone else before himself.
During the 30-45 seconds that this is talked about on screen Boimler isn't doing this to scheme to get a better position. He's literally preparing for an interview. That's it. His tone is flat and basic. No one has an issue with what he's doing until the point about the private logs gets brought up.
Now. If you would refer back to my original comment where this all stemmed from you will see this:
Ah yeah you’re right. It’s been a hot minute since I’ve seen the episode. However, if I remember correctly, the reason he was making the holodeck program was to simulate crew for interviews. At least he was trying to make them as realistic as possible for a genuinely noble reason. He just happened to do something mildly horrific to get it done.
I completely stand by that. I'd probably add a sentence or two to the end to hammer down how horrific the private logs thing is. At least more than the joke that's on the end of the comment about what my logs would look like out of paranoia. I'm sorry if that came across as unclear but it wasn't to me. His reasons/intentions for doing it where noble. The actions were not. I never claimed that his actions were noble. You are complaining about something I never said. Please stop presuming to know what my argument is before you ask for it.
Have a good day but I'm checking out of this conversation. There's nothing good that can come from continuing this.
Unpopular opinion(?): Barclay’s fantasies weren’t the creepy thing about this episode. Nothing wrong with having weird fantasies, as long as you keep them to yourself, and Barclay never meant for anyone else to see his holodeck programs.
The unsettling thing about this episode, to me, is the fact that the holodeck apparently doesn’t have any usage restrictions on the likenesses of real people. They really ought to have an opt-in system for allowing others to simulate you on the holodeck.
TL;DR: He just like me fr!!!! /j
I'm just trying to compare this to real-world equivalents and honestly your point keeps getting more and more true to me. If you were to police someone from having fantasies about someone then that is just thought crime. The Holodeck is just an extension of your imagination, or at least it can be, so provided it's private then there's no reason to have anything against it.
So real-world. You start writing a story with the help of ChatGPT. It has a bunch of numerous open-ended ways of going through it so there is a level of interaction. The story involves real world people but they are based loosely on their real world selves, mostly focusing on perceived personality traits. Not famous people either but people you work with and are close to. So far so good. Using CG you make visual representation of these people. A little 'odd' but not illegal. I don't see it as immoral or unethical either considering it's a private fantasy. Someone then walks in and sees it and has an emotional reaction. But yet again there's nothing wrong about that. Just because they discovered it doesn't mean that it was wrong to do so. It sucks that the person feels that way but it wasn't about them. It was about the person who was fantasizing.
So I also popped this episode on while typing this and was skipping throughout. I forgot about one bit which relates to your 'real unsettling thing'. Riker says that creating versions of crew on the holodeck was against protocol. LaForge points out that there isn't any protocol against it and given his past experience he would definitely know whether that was true or not. Riker then says that there should be protocol against it. We've also seen Mariner do it on the Cerritos. The Holo-Whateverthefuck on La Sirena. I'm sure there are other examples too that just aren't coming to mind at the moment. So Starfleet really doesn't give a shit whether you remake someone on holodeck or not. Private sector really doesn't give a shit either given Rios/Sevens ship.
I like your idea of an opt-in system. "Please select all genres and roles you are willing to have your holo participate in." Then it's just like a 150 point list of all kinds of random shit from "Tourist" to "Murder Victim" to "Red Shirt".
That was Boimler. Mariner just appropriated his program for her own purposes. She even initially objects to the fact that he based the characters off the logs of the crew.
Ah yeah you're right. It's been a hot minute since I've seen the episode. However, if I remember correctly, the reason he was making the holodeck program was to simulate crew for interviews. At least he was trying to make them as realistic as possible for a genuinely noble reason. He just happened to do something mildly horrific to get it done.
I swear, my logs on any Starfleet ship would be something like "Nice day today. I had soup." "Today I drew an art." "If a woodchuck could chuck wood..."
He wanted a leg up to advance his career....
Yes. And?
And that's hardly noble.
To you. I disagree.
Your argument is that it's noble to invade your friends' and co-workers' privacy so you can attempt to further your career goals?
No. My argument is not. My argument is something else entirely. Something that you previously quoted three comments ago so I'd really appreciate it if you didn't make shit up and then shove those words down my throat.
My argument is, and has always been, that the intentions were noble. He went into wanting to further his career. As we've seen time and time again with Boimler, the dude is painfully head over heels in love with the ideals of Starfleet. For standing up for whats right but also for committing himself to what he can do. Is he the best officer? Absolutely not. Does he make constant bad decisions? Absolutely. But he routinely puts Starfleet and everyone else before himself.
During the 30-45 seconds that this is talked about on screen Boimler isn't doing this to scheme to get a better position. He's literally preparing for an interview. That's it. His tone is flat and basic. No one has an issue with what he's doing until the point about the private logs gets brought up.
Now. If you would refer back to my original comment where this all stemmed from you will see this:
I completely stand by that. I'd probably add a sentence or two to the end to hammer down how horrific the private logs thing is. At least more than the joke that's on the end of the comment about what my logs would look like out of paranoia. I'm sorry if that came across as unclear but it wasn't to me. His reasons/intentions for doing it where noble. The actions were not. I never claimed that his actions were noble. You are complaining about something I never said. Please stop presuming to know what my argument is before you ask for it.
Have a good day but I'm checking out of this conversation. There's nothing good that can come from continuing this.