• booty [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is not unsafe.
    It is not 100% private. Admins can read your messages if they choose to investigate your messages.

    These points contradict one another.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      ·
      1 year ago

      How so? The message is safely delivered solely to the intended recipient, albeit in plain text (not private).

      If there's anywhere that the commonly used email analogy fits, I think it would be here

      • booty [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Safe and private are synonyms in this context.

          • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unless I run a Lemmy instance myself (which is possible), I have zero reason to trust an instance's admins.

            Even if my instance's admin happens to be the founder of privacyguides.org, that doesn't mean he will never read any "private" messages (or be forced by someone else to hand them over).

              • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
                ·
                1 year ago

                Even if I did fully trust my instance, I also would have to trust any instance I message with.

                I personally just use Lemmy for public comments.

          • booty [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            What definition of safe are you using which makes a private messaging system without privacy safe? What would have to occur for it to become unsafe, if not being private does not make it unsafe in your eyes?

      • booty [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        If something claims to be unsafe and delivers, that doesn't make it any more safe.

      • booty [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        They absolutely do. A private messaging system which is not private is the definition of unsafe. Especially in the context of a post on !privacy@lemmy.ml