The Pressed Steel Car Strike of 1909 was an American labor dispute which ran from July to September in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The strike was triggered on July 10th, a payday on which many workers were shorted by the Pressed Steel Car Company.

The strike began on July 13th, and grew to include more than 8,000 workers, 3,000 of whom were also from the Standard Steel Car Company. By the next day, 500 cops began working to protect strikebreakers and evict strikers from company houses. The New York Times called the immigrant workforce "savages" and "illiterate foreigners".

Management refused to speak with the workers' representatives and James Rider, manager of the Pressed Steel Car Company, responded to their strike by hiring Pearl Bergoff, a notorious owner of a strike-breaking paramilitary force.

The workers were joined by members of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), including founders William Trautmann and "Big Bill" Haywood, as well as "Smiling Joe" Ettor.

The walkout drew national attention when, on this day in 1909, a bloody battle took place between strikers, private security agents, and the Pennsylvania State Police. The violence began after strikers boarded a trolley to search for scabs and they were confronted by an armed deputy, who opened fire. In the fighting that followed, between 12 and 26 people were killed.

The strike was settled on September 8th when Pressed Steel Car agreed to a wage increase, the posting of wage rates, and ended abuses in company housing practices. This labor dispute would be a precursor to the Great Steel Strike of 1919.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • heartheartbreak [fae/faer]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I had followed her for a while so I knew she was really trying to rep China on the global Internet but didnt hear about this so I did my best digging. It seems like a combination of a few factors.

    It looks like she had uncovered a possible exploit in the sogou keyboard that could record keyboard inputs in 2019 and was trying to publicize it a bit. The exploit was recently announced in a paper where it was covered up a bit by authorities, forcing the keyboard manufacturer and authorities to take it seriously.

    Secondly, it looks like they cited Signal and probably other opsec stuff she was using (as she is a tech YouTuber so kinda naturally) as suspicious (which unfortunately makes sense as signal is well known to be what the CIA uses for assets).

    Thirdly, while obviously doing her best to represent China and Chinese people as people, she is also pretty openly and explicitly critical about homophobia in China (although she is also definitely critical about homophobia elsewhere especially in regards to how the west treats the Chinese lgbtq community). These types of tweets were probably cited in the investigation.

    So it was probably some combination of these three factors that caused whatever bureaucrat that's in charge of investigating spies to come down on her. Really unfortunate too since I think she had some really great and interesting content, although it does look like she is still focused on putting out content just not posting as much. This counts as her second strike where a third strike is a year in prison.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      This sucks. Pardon me for assuming that a gay woman in tech with an outlandish personal style is not being investigated in good faith.

      • Saizaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        ·
        1 year ago

        Highly recommend reading the actual article from which I assume the previous commenter got fear info from: https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/naomi-wu-and-the-silence-that-speaks-volumes?

        The article contains an interview with Naomi aswell.

        Also as a slight correction the third strike could lead to years in prison according to the article, not a single year.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I'd take that article with some salt. If they're still engaging with the bullshit "Uighur Genocide" narrative their credibility and/or goals are open to question. Regardless, I hope Naomi's okay this shit sucks. : (

          • Saizaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh I always take any reporting on China by western media with a grain of salt (the amount varying by the outlet in question). I haven't quite made up my mind on Uighur thing as I haven't had the time to properly research it myself (a lot of irl stuff going on) but I'm approaching the topic with scepticism.

            I mainly linked the article for the interview and it's description of the state of things for the lgbtq+ community in China which seems to be pretty similar to what an onilne friend from China described. Althoguh the language used around the topic and some of the conclusions (interpretations) in the article are pretty weird.

            In retrospect I probably should've put a disclaimer that I don't endorse the entirety of the article.

            • Frank [he/him, he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              I would strongly reccomend reading the UN report on Xinjiang. It goes in to some detail on what the UN investigators think was happening. The very short version is that China's counter terrorism program did involve human rights abuses, but it was arbitrary arrests, arbitrary detentions for periods of several months, things of that nature and severity. Still not nice, still abuses, but a far, far, far cry from the strident claims of genocide. I think it's an important read because the western propaganda narrative has been so uncritically accepted, and because the un report discusses the kernel of truth, or as close as you can get to truth, from which the propaganda was built up.

              • daisy
                ·
                1 year ago

                The very short version is that China's counter terrorism program did involve human rights abuses, but it was arbitrary arrests, arbitrary detentions for periods of several months, things of that nature and severity.

                Sounds like US department of homeland security stuff.