The Algerian government is critical of the coup in Niger but opposes any potential military intervention by ECOWAS, calling instead for a political solution.
We KNOW that the French definitely don't have the interest of the Nigerian people at heart. (ask more if this isn't clear).
We also know that the French government is neoliberal capitalist, and opposes the aims of the global socialist movement.
It remains to be seen how "good" or how "socialist" the future government turns out to be, but their initial actions of being hostile to French colonialism have been good for socialism so far.
the most demonstrable action has been to cut off exports of uranium to France, putting the government of Niger in the driver's seat to control that. Now we wait (months, years?) to see if they use that to benefit their people.
Yes, my bad, and I agree but I wish (who tf cares what I wish lol) that they would do their revolutionary action under a socialist banner which isn't exactly how I see it at this point.
We KNOW that the French definitely don't have the interest of the Nigerian people at heart. (ask more if this isn't clear).
Of course. I took that for granted that a former European colonizer wouldn't.
the most demonstrable action has been to cut off exports of uranium to France, putting the government of Niger in the driver's seat to control that. Now we wait (months, years?) to see if they use that to benefit their people.
They could easily switch to exporting to a country in a different ideological camp. International relations is always about power - no country behaves altruistically on the world stage.
Right. I think we are about in the same place then. We need to see what comes up next.
There are certainly questions we can discuss about the democratic process, and where it may fall short, and it may be necessary to circumvent, but that's probably a topic for another thread.
I think that looking ahead, the country is better off paving a new future rather than restoring a government that's gonna cozy right up to the French again and maintain the status quo. That could backfire. I guess one thought is that even if it backfires and they end up in kind of an Iran situation, the situation is overall good for the global socialist movement since it weakens at least one colonial power, and we can hope that the movement reforms the country again to something "good" at some point in the future.
Any long-term solution to Niger's issues has to come from within the people of Niger, of course.
I expect that a status quo change is likely only on a geopolitical scale and that once the excitement of a change in government dies down the military will run into and perpetuate much the same issues.
I only really trust China to be able to invest and trade with the Global South without being exploitative (even if they aren't doing so out of altruism).
Could be two or more global powers in one of Niger locks down uranium exports for long enough – or even just racks up the price. Geopolitically, bringing Nigerien uranium into China's orbit at the same time as bringing Afghan lithium into China's orbit is going to have a ripple effect eventually. Hard to predict more than that.
I'm not super well read on it, but to summarize:
Also:
Revolutionary action, in this case a coup, is important to drive out colonial/imperialist grip over the country.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-66562765
Note: I assume you mean Nigerien (Niger) not Nigerian (Nigeria)
Yes, my bad, and I agree but I wish (who tf cares what I wish lol) that they would do their revolutionary action under a socialist banner which isn't exactly how I see it at this point.
the socialist banner will take many years to revive
True true, but something like a decolonial coup in a random African country could be the start of its revival idk
We will hope so!
I mean, didn't they say that "Sankara showed that the only path forward for Burkina Faso is socialism"? Or am I misremembering?
thank you for teachin me that o7
Of course. I took that for granted that a former European colonizer wouldn't.
They could easily switch to exporting to a country in a different ideological camp. International relations is always about power - no country behaves altruistically on the world stage.
Right. I think we are about in the same place then. We need to see what comes up next.
There are certainly questions we can discuss about the democratic process, and where it may fall short, and it may be necessary to circumvent, but that's probably a topic for another thread.
I think that looking ahead, the country is better off paving a new future rather than restoring a government that's gonna cozy right up to the French again and maintain the status quo. That could backfire. I guess one thought is that even if it backfires and they end up in kind of an Iran situation, the situation is overall good for the global socialist movement since it weakens at least one colonial power, and we can hope that the movement reforms the country again to something "good" at some point in the future.
Any long-term solution to Niger's issues has to come from within the people of Niger, of course.
I expect that a status quo change is likely only on a geopolitical scale and that once the excitement of a change in government dies down the military will run into and perpetuate much the same issues.
I only really trust China to be able to invest and trade with the Global South without being exploitative (even if they aren't doing so out of altruism).
Could be two or more global powers in one of Niger locks down uranium exports for long enough – or even just racks up the price. Geopolitically, bringing Nigerien uranium into China's orbit at the same time as bringing Afghan lithium into China's orbit is going to have a ripple effect eventually. Hard to predict more than that.
Wasn't that just a rumor (would rock if true though)
Idk, if it's not true than that would change my thoughts on the current situation