I have literally never heard of it happening anywhere else in the world. I never said American things couldn't be talked about, but talking about it like it's a ubiquitous practice, and then getting angry at people who don't understand why it's an issue, is just miscommunication, not a big disagreement. And miscommunications caused by America-centrism is a very tiring affair on the internet. Just prepend the post with "Hey Americans:" and there wouldn't have been any real discussion.
but talking about it like it's a ubiquitous practice, and then getting angry at people who don't understand why it's an issue, is just miscommunication.
I have no idea how you could possibly have gotten that from what I wrote.
At no point did I mention America, yet it's somehow American because you haven't heard of it?
At no point did I say it was ubiquitous (in fact I've just said it wasn't).
At no point was the issue one of something widespread being bad.
At no point did I write that they talked about it like it's a common thing.
You are reading what you want, rather than what the text says.
A user calmy and patiently explained why and how stacking rocks near waterstreams was bad. This made other users irrationally angry.
The issue was never one of miscommunication, as I have written already. The whole thing was communicated clearly. Users that understood what the practice was, and understood the reasoning for it being bad, were angry that they were being told it was bad and they shouldn't do it.
I'm really struggling to see how you could have gotten any of this from what I wrote. Did you learn to read in that weird way where you just memorized the shape of words, rather than the phonics of letters?
Hey Americans:" and there wouldn't have been any real discussion.
I was literally in that struggle thread (different account) - I wasn't claiming you said certain things, I was commenting on what that thread was. Unless we're talking about entirely different threads about the same thing.
I was also in that thread at the time.
I assumed you were claiming I said these things, as I'd already once asked how you thought it was an American thing, and since you were using "you" phrases. I guess that's the problem with English where the plural and the personal is the same.
It was at no point an american thing specifically, so I still don't get how you think it is americacentric. The fact that you haven't heard of it outside such a context doesn't mean it is, certainly not when you've been informed that it was relevant outside such a context. Taking care of nature is relevant across borders.
As I've already said, I'm not american, but it was relevant to me.
I have literally never heard of it happening anywhere else in the world. I never said American things couldn't be talked about, but talking about it like it's a ubiquitous practice, and then getting angry at people who don't understand why it's an issue, is just miscommunication, not a big disagreement. And miscommunications caused by America-centrism is a very tiring affair on the internet. Just prepend the post with "Hey Americans:" and there wouldn't have been any real discussion.
I have no idea how you could possibly have gotten that from what I wrote.
At no point did I mention America, yet it's somehow American because you haven't heard of it?
At no point did I say it was ubiquitous (in fact I've just said it wasn't).
At no point was the issue one of something widespread being bad.
At no point did I write that they talked about it like it's a common thing.
You are reading what you want, rather than what the text says.
A user calmy and patiently explained why and how stacking rocks near waterstreams was bad. This made other users irrationally angry.
The issue was never one of miscommunication, as I have written already. The whole thing was communicated clearly. Users that understood what the practice was, and understood the reasoning for it being bad, were angry that they were being told it was bad and they shouldn't do it.
I'm really struggling to see how you could have gotten any of this from what I wrote. Did you learn to read in that weird way where you just memorized the shape of words, rather than the phonics of letters?
Again, it has nothing to do with America at all.
I was literally in that struggle thread (different account) - I wasn't claiming you said certain things, I was commenting on what that thread was. Unless we're talking about entirely different threads about the same thing.
I was also in that thread at the time.
I assumed you were claiming I said these things, as I'd already once asked how you thought it was an American thing, and since you were using "you" phrases. I guess that's the problem with English where the plural and the personal is the same.
It was at no point an american thing specifically, so I still don't get how you think it is americacentric. The fact that you haven't heard of it outside such a context doesn't mean it is, certainly not when you've been informed that it was relevant outside such a context. Taking care of nature is relevant across borders.
As I've already said, I'm not american, but it was relevant to me.
Here's the original thread, determine for yourself if you want