• Melonius [he/him]
    ·
    10 months ago

    The game is kinda meh from what I've seen? Any positive impressions?

    • ryepunk [he/him]
      ·
      10 months ago

      The most positive I've heard is that it is a by the numbers Bethesda rpg game. It doesn't try to be anything more. If you liked fallout 4 and skyrim odds are you'll like this.

    • OptimusPrimeRib@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve heard nothing but good things about gameplay. But it runs like shit on most systems. A RTX 3080 at 1440p ultra can’t get 60 fps in cities.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      ·
      10 months ago

      Still downloading for me, but I see more than one review saying it takes a long time to get good. I'm keeping my expectations low.

        • Awoo [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Starfield really does look and run great.

          Run great? Absolutely not.

          I get 120fps in Elden Ring at medium, 2070, 64gb ram, i9-12900k.

          Just got done with Armored Core, rock solid 144fps at medium all the way through, never a blip.

          This runs at 30fps on lowest settings. It runs like absolute crap. It's incredibly jarring to go from games that are gorgeous and well made with high performance to this thing running like something 20 years ago. Absolutely zero optimisation.

          It will get a seriously negative response from the average pc user when user reviews start hitting due to this performance.

          • leftzero@lemmy.ml
            ·
            10 months ago

            Best comparison I've heard (by Gopher, if I recall correctly) is Outer Worlds, but less silly, and bigger by several orders of magnitude.

            • Techmaster@lemm.ee
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yeah Outer Worlds was awesome but very limited. So limited that it almost felt linear.