You're sidestepping the issue. Why are you defending a clear escalation between nuclear powers? This is the sort of shit the post title is calling out.
My man, you've invaded half the world. You have no moral high ground to be talking about "freedom and independence". You've done exactly the same shit all over Latin America, except you did it with coups and narcotrafficos instead of straight up invasion.
So am I, in fact I was in disbelief when it happened because it seemed monumentally bad geopolitically, though I understand the plight of the people besieged in the Donbas region. As it stands now though you are literally defending a NATO country making a first strike against Russia (Ukraine is as we all know not a part of NATO)
you are literally defending a NATO country making a first strike against Russia (Ukraine is as we all know not a part of NATO)
No i am not. this entire thread is about Russia striking the UK with a Tidal wave caused by a Sarmat missile. I merely stopped by to remind the tankies that they are not the only ones with nuclear missiles and if they were to detonate a warhead anywhere near a NATO country they would quickly be glassed.
That fact alone should bring you to the conclusion that Putin will not launch one. he is many things but he is not suicidal
Who is "they" lmao you're an idiot. Are these tankies in the room with us? Do you think anyone on Lemmygrad is in the war room with Putin to tell him "hey bro that's not a great idea"?
Get some fucking perspective or fuck off back to reddit where your fellow liberals will always tell you you are right and the most intelligent person in the room -- alongside them, of course.
So you want NATO to strike Russia and inflict civilian casualties with impunity? I'm sorry I'm just trying to figure out what your actual stance is here.
Also I am not a "tankie" so you can stop throwing that admittedly meaningless term around.
My stance here is Putin cannot use Sarmat in the way channel one commenters and Russian propaganda enjoyers keep urging him to because he is not the only one with nukes
You think and wish Putin cannot use those, and u fucking moron liberals are willing to bet the whole planet's lives on this... Fuck u westerners, if u want to suicide your whole society take Russia, go to Mars and kill yourselves there.
You have invaded Iraq, Afghanistan , Libya and Yugoslavia without any hesitation , funded Neo Nazis in Ukraine , funded ISIS in Syria and are occupying oil rich parts of Syria, thats rich coming from westerners to accuse Russia for invading something . Lol
I'm pretty sure most of the United States was not part of the United States at one time, and there were other people living there at the time... I wonder what happened to them?
You're sidestepping the issue. Why are you defending a clear escalation between nuclear powers? This is the sort of shit the post title is calling out.
We haven't invaded any neighbours. Russia could de-escalate completely by just fucking off
Lmao war is okay as long as you don't do it to your neighbors 🤡
I wish Russia would invade your house. Not your country, just your house specifically.
US stole Mexico's lands to begin with, when they will get their lands back from these righteous libs ?or is it get over with it ?
My man, you've invaded half the world. You have no moral high ground to be talking about "freedom and independence". You've done exactly the same shit all over Latin America, except you did it with coups and narcotrafficos instead of straight up invasion.
You are sidestepping the issue still. Why are you defending an action that could trigger a nuclear war?
Edit: Also are you claiming the US or NATO have not invaded anyone? Because holy shit.
I'm not, i am vehemently against the invasion of Ukraine actually.
So am I, in fact I was in disbelief when it happened because it seemed monumentally bad geopolitically, though I understand the plight of the people besieged in the Donbas region. As it stands now though you are literally defending a NATO country making a first strike against Russia (Ukraine is as we all know not a part of NATO)
No i am not. this entire thread is about Russia striking the UK with a Tidal wave caused by a Sarmat missile. I merely stopped by to remind the tankies that they are not the only ones with nuclear missiles and if they were to detonate a warhead anywhere near a NATO country they would quickly be glassed.
That fact alone should bring you to the conclusion that Putin will not launch one. he is many things but he is not suicidal
Who is "they" lmao you're an idiot. Are these tankies in the room with us? Do you think anyone on Lemmygrad is in the war room with Putin to tell him "hey bro that's not a great idea"?
Get some fucking perspective or fuck off back to reddit where your fellow liberals will always tell you you are right and the most intelligent person in the room -- alongside them, of course.
So you want NATO to strike Russia and inflict civilian casualties with impunity? I'm sorry I'm just trying to figure out what your actual stance is here.
Also I am not a "tankie" so you can stop throwing that admittedly meaningless term around.
My stance here is Putin cannot use Sarmat in the way channel one commenters and Russian propaganda enjoyers keep urging him to because he is not the only one with nukes
You think and wish Putin cannot use those, and u fucking moron liberals are willing to bet the whole planet's lives on this... Fuck u westerners, if u want to suicide your whole society take Russia, go to Mars and kill yourselves there.
My stance is that supporting direct NATO aggression toward them is genocidal.
None of us are saying that he should launch nukes, we openly dread the idea, we just have nothing we could do to stop him.
and you know Putin and his government officials and his people just by looking through your home windows ?
I follow telegram and youtube channels for both sides.
What, Fox News and CNN? That's what that tends to mean for liberals like you.
You have invaded Iraq, Afghanistan , Libya and Yugoslavia without any hesitation , funded Neo Nazis in Ukraine , funded ISIS in Syria and are occupying oil rich parts of Syria, thats rich coming from westerners to accuse Russia for invading something . Lol
Russia has its own share of meddling in the middle east and africa
Seriously, if you're going to point the finger at least make sure it can't be pointed back at you.
And i said "Invade neighbours" not "invade". Stop putting words in my mouth
You should probably listen to the most recent season of Blowback wrt the soviet-Afghan war.
I'll even give you all the episodes for free cuz I am a dirty commie.
im laughing everytime the soviets funded someone it was the native population fighting oppressors and the US was always funding colonizers
Well, actually...
Just because you're not the invaders this time (what's arguable) it doesn't make you morally better than anyone
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
I'm pretty sure most of the United States was not part of the United States at one time, and there were other people living there at the time... I wonder what happened to them?