Well, I hate to be a disappointment but I don't know how much of a dedicated week-by-week task runner I can be. Life is going to be hectic for me in the next year.
However, I will be researching Latin America - Venezuela in particular but it's all linked - very deeply in the coming months as part of my dissertation and creative process. I will have a pretty good database to share along the way, hopefully.
Your country threads are great, and the effort that goes in there must be huge. I don't know who's the Ukraine watchdog, but if they're out there too - wow - you are an absolute workhorse too.
However, I was thinking of something larger, more long term, and casual. A bit like the primers on topics like Ughyur situation, Ukraine, etc, but bigger, and less about disproving a controversial narrative I guess. If everything I'm about to say is basic, or jargon, or too idealistic, or whatever - please, shoot me down. Fill me with holes. I would rather have criticism than placation, even if it's severe.
TEXT WALL INCOMING:
Something that I see a lot in this site is people with a lot of free time, great opinions, well read, but reduced capacity for in person praxis despite an inner desire to do praxis. Whether it's alienation, physical disability, nihilism, neurodiversity, financial stress, not knowing where to begin, COVID fears, distrust in local organisations - whatever it may be - the people remain posting. And my idea is that posting could be praxis.
Issues are super multifaceted, and so is the way people are persuaded. Theory is gold, but the stuff people often post on this website - personal anecdotes (a large part of Bullshit Jobs is based off personal testimony), memes (humour is a huge tool of persuasion and can be effective at highlighting contradictions), documentation of events (like the seemingly daily Ukrainian soldier with Nazi insignia), and media recommendations.
If the people's posting power (of which this site is so proud) could be documented, I think we could be surprisingly effective. If anyone ever wants to do praxis - well, there you go - find some info and submit it to the community archive. So much information on this website is consumed and then goes into the deep hexbear archive, often never to be returned to. It just needs to be open source, accessible, while also being moderated enough to cut bullshit out. I don't know how to go about it - currently it sounds a bit like a left wing Wikipedia. In my head, I can see it more like a giant 4D map, or a big messy case file sprawling out over a desk.
I know, annoyingly conceptual and vague... but there's something in there that keeps me coming back to the idea.
I don't know how to go about it - currently it sounds a bit like a left wing Wikipedia. In my head, I can see it more like a giant 4D map, or a big messy case file sprawling out over a desk.
Well to butt in again, I don't know enough about it, but people here have said good things about Obsidian. This is the place I know of that shows how it might be used to build an interconnected knowledge base. I think it would be better for the kind of thing you're describing than a wiki would. There's no "4D map" but it does have a rotating 3D map of how different sections connect. Just a thought.
Helloooo
Well, I hate to be a disappointment but I don't know how much of a dedicated week-by-week task runner I can be. Life is going to be hectic for me in the next year.
However, I will be researching Latin America - Venezuela in particular but it's all linked - very deeply in the coming months as part of my dissertation and creative process. I will have a pretty good database to share along the way, hopefully.
Your country threads are great, and the effort that goes in there must be huge. I don't know who's the Ukraine watchdog, but if they're out there too - wow - you are an absolute workhorse too.
However, I was thinking of something larger, more long term, and casual. A bit like the primers on topics like Ughyur situation, Ukraine, etc, but bigger, and less about disproving a controversial narrative I guess. If everything I'm about to say is basic, or jargon, or too idealistic, or whatever - please, shoot me down. Fill me with holes. I would rather have criticism than placation, even if it's severe.
TEXT WALL INCOMING:
Something that I see a lot in this site is people with a lot of free time, great opinions, well read, but reduced capacity for in person praxis despite an inner desire to do praxis. Whether it's alienation, physical disability, nihilism, neurodiversity, financial stress, not knowing where to begin, COVID fears, distrust in local organisations - whatever it may be - the people remain posting. And my idea is that posting could be praxis.
Issues are super multifaceted, and so is the way people are persuaded. Theory is gold, but the stuff people often post on this website - personal anecdotes (a large part of Bullshit Jobs is based off personal testimony), memes (humour is a huge tool of persuasion and can be effective at highlighting contradictions), documentation of events (like the seemingly daily Ukrainian soldier with Nazi insignia), and media recommendations.
If the people's posting power (of which this site is so proud) could be documented, I think we could be surprisingly effective. If anyone ever wants to do praxis - well, there you go - find some info and submit it to the community archive. So much information on this website is consumed and then goes into the deep hexbear archive, often never to be returned to. It just needs to be open source, accessible, while also being moderated enough to cut bullshit out. I don't know how to go about it - currently it sounds a bit like a left wing Wikipedia. In my head, I can see it more like a giant 4D map, or a big messy case file sprawling out over a desk.
I know, annoyingly conceptual and vague... but there's something in there that keeps me coming back to the idea.
Well to butt in again, I don't know enough about it, but people here have said good things about Obsidian. This is the place I know of that shows how it might be used to build an interconnected knowledge base. I think it would be better for the kind of thing you're describing than a wiki would. There's no "4D map" but it does have a rotating 3D map of how different sections connect. Just a thought.