Which allowed the GOP controlled house to elect a much more fashy religious zealot who will be waaaaay worse for the country?
Am I missing something here? How is this not the biggest "own goal" they have pulled in recent memory? Now we get to listen to endless whining by liberal media outlets about how evil the new anti-daddy of the week is?
It’s the limits of a 2 party system and the dumb house system.
Yeah, but isn't their whole thing "harm reduction"? If you have a feckless enemy, wouldn't it make more sense to leave them in place instead of rolling the dice on the next fascist?
They only care about harm reduction when it’s a statement.
But there is no reason for the Dems to ever say Yes to any Republican rep.