To play Israeli’s advocate: if the commander was killed in the 9th, they would have had two weeks to pick a new commander who was then also killed on the 23rd. The post doesn’t name any names, just refers to position which wouldn’t change.
Edit: to be clear, I do not believe this. It is clearly propaganda.
but 23 is the year number. the date of the original tweet was november 1, meaning hamas would have had 8 days to select a new commander. ofc as you said we all know israel just decided some random guy they killed must have been in charge of something ;)
To play Israeli’s advocate: if the commander was killed in the 9th, they would have had two weeks to pick a new commander who was then also killed on the 23rd. The post doesn’t name any names, just refers to position which wouldn’t change.
Edit: to be clear, I do not believe this. It is clearly propaganda.
but 23 is the year number. the date of the original tweet was november 1, meaning hamas would have had 8 days to select a new commander. ofc as you said we all know israel just decided some random guy they killed must have been in charge of something ;)
Oof, great reading comprehension on my part. Good correction